Effects of different energy and protein levels on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality of Pekin ducks

This study was conducted to determine the effects of different energy and protein levels on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and taste scores of Pekin ducks. A total of 1,800 numbers of 15-day-old ducks (10 replicate pens, 60 birds/pen, 819 ± 18 g/duck) were blocked based on body weight (BW) and randomly allotted to three treatments with different metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP) levels in this 28-day experiment. Dietary treatments were as follows: (1) low energy protein (LEP), 3,150 kcal/kg and 16% for the grower diet and 3,250 kcal/kg and 15% for the finisher diet; (2) medium energy protein (MEP), 3,250 kcal/kg and 16.5% for the grower diet and 3,350 kcal/kg and 15.5% for the finisher diet; (3) high energy protein (HEP), 3,350 kcal/kg and 17% for the grower diet and 3,450 kcal/kg and 16% for the finisher diet. During days 15-28, body weight gain (BWG) in the LEP group was higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas FI, F/G, and caloric conversion were lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the MEP and HEP groups. During days 29-42, birds fed with LEP and HEP diets had lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) BWG but higher F/G and caloric conversion compared with those fed with the MEP diet. Birds fed with the LEP diet had higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) BWG than those fed with MEP and HEP diets throughout the experiment. The abdominal fat yield in the LEP group was lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than in the HEP group. Birds fed with the LEP diet had higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) left breast meat yields than those fed with MEP and HEP diets. The roasting loss in the LEP and HEP groups was lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than in the MEP group. Birds fed with LEP and HEP diets had higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) comprehensive scores, flavor scores, scent scores, and taste scores, but lower color scores compared with those fed with the MEP diet. In summary, the LEP diet with the lowest cost may be the most appropriate based on growth performance, roasting loss, and taste scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1438526
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of different energy and protein levels on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality of Pekin ducks

P. Y. Zhao, Lihui Zhou, Xiang Ao, Wenyan Zhao
1 citations
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
1.19
article

Effects of different energy and protein levels on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality of Pekin ducks

P. Y. Zhao, Lihui Zhou, Xiang Ao, Wenyan Zhao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of different energy and protein levels on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and taste scores of Pekin ducks. A total of 1,800 numbers of 15-day-old ducks (10 replicate pens, 60 birds/pen, 819 ± 18 g/duck) were blocked based on body weight (BW) and randomly allotted to three treatments with different metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP) levels in this 28-day experiment. Dietary treatments were as follows: (1) low energy protein (LEP), 3,150 kcal/kg and 16% for the grower diet and 3,250 kcal/kg and 15% for the finisher diet; (2) medium energy protein (MEP), 3,250 kcal/kg and 16.5% for the grower diet and 3,350 kcal/kg and 15.5% for the finisher diet; (3) high energy protein (HEP), 3,350 kcal/kg and 17% for the grower diet and 3,450 kcal/kg and 16% for the finisher diet. During days 15-28, body weight gain (BWG) in the LEP group was higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas FI, F/G, and caloric conversion were lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the MEP and HEP groups. During days 29-42, birds fed with LEP and HEP diets had lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) BWG but higher F/G and caloric conversion compared with those fed with the MEP diet. Birds fed with the LEP diet had higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) BWG than those fed with MEP and HEP diets throughout the experiment. The abdominal fat yield in the LEP group was lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than in the HEP group. Birds fed with the LEP diet had higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) left breast meat yields than those fed with MEP and HEP diets. The roasting loss in the LEP and HEP groups was lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than in the MEP group. Birds fed with LEP and HEP diets had higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) comprehensive scores, flavor scores, scent scores, and taste scores, but lower color scores compared with those fed with the MEP diet. In summary, the LEP diet with the lowest cost may be the most appropriate based on growth performance, roasting loss, and taste scores.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 12
Yibin University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.