Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers

Abstract The editors of Tectonics would like to offer our sincere thanks to those who reviewed manuscripts for us in 2024. The time reviewers spend reading and commenting on manuscripts helps to ensure that our science is well communicated, clearly documented, appropriately placed in the context of prior work, and effectively archived for future usage. We understand that as one of the AGU journals hosting long format articles, reviewing a manuscript for Tectonics is a considerable time commitment. For this reason, we are particularly grateful to our reviewers for their diligence in helping to provide high‐quality, timely reviews. We also appreciate the efforts many reviewers contribute toward advancing open science by evaluating the availability and accessibility of data, which are key objectives of the AGU's FAIR data policy. The papers published in Tectonics in 2024 benefitted from the careful scrutiny and constructive critique drawn from the expertise of 493 reviewers, who provided a total of 706 reviews. We are grateful for this contribution toward producing the high‐quality output that has helped Tectonics maintain a prominent position in scientific publishing for decades, and for the spirit of teamwork that makes the peer review process an asset in our community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tectonics
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025tc008911
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers

Taylor Schildgen, Federico Rossetti, Djordje Grujić, Margaret Rusmore et al.
Tectonics
Research Data Management Practices
article

Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers

Taylor Schildgen, Federico Rossetti, Djordje Grujić, Margaret Rusmore, Laurent Jolivet
article en

Abstract

Abstract The editors of Tectonics would like to offer our sincere thanks to those who reviewed manuscripts for us in 2024. The time reviewers spend reading and commenting on manuscripts helps to ensure that our science is well communicated, clearly documented, appropriately placed in the context of prior work, and effectively archived for future usage. We understand that as one of the AGU journals hosting long format articles, reviewing a manuscript for Tectonics is a considerable time commitment. For this reason, we are particularly grateful to our reviewers for their diligence in helping to provide high‐quality, timely reviews. We also appreciate the efforts many reviewers contribute toward advancing open science by evaluating the availability and accessibility of data, which are key objectives of the AGU's FAIR data policy. The papers published in Tectonics in 2024 benefitted from the careful scrutiny and constructive critique drawn from the expertise of 493 reviewers, who provided a total of 706 reviews. We are grateful for this contribution toward producing the high‐quality output that has helped Tectonics maintain a prominent position in scientific publishing for decades, and for the spirit of teamwork that makes the peer review process an asset in our community.

TectonicsVol. 44(3)
Roma Tre University (IT), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Dalhousie University (CA), University of Potsdam (DE), Sorbonne Université (FR), Institut des Sciences de la Terre de Paris (FR), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Occidental College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.