Agreement between physical examination and dynamic sonography in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Objective: For years, physical examination (PE) findings (e.g., Barlow, Ortolani tests, and abduction limitation) have been used as theprimary screening method in the early diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). There are a limited number of studies in the literature that evaluate the agreement of PE findings and dynamic sonographic evaluation. Our aim was to evaluate the correlation between dynamic sonographic hip types and physical examination findings in infants with DDH. Methods: A total of 281 infants (562 hips) with DDH younger than 6 months who were given Pavlik harness treatment were includedin the study. Socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, and race) of the infants were recorded. The concordance betweenthe PE findings and sonographic findings of the patients at the first admission was evaluated. The agreement analysis between thedynamic sonography evaluations and the PE results was demonstrated by Cohen’s kappa (k) coe!cient and Kendall’s coe!cient (W) ofconcordance. Results: Of the 55 hips evaluated as normal in PE, 21 were normal, 25 were found to have dysplasia, and 9 were subluxated/or subluxatable on dynamic sonography. It was observed that 30 (13%) of 219 hips which were dislocated on dynamic sonography were found to be lax on the PE. The overall percentage of agreement between the physical examination and dynamic sonography was 72.4. The Cohen kappa for agreement between the PE and dynamic sonography was 0.541 (CI: 0.479-0.602). The agreement between Ortolani test evaluation with PE and Ortolani test evaluation of patients diagnosed with dislocated hip by dynamic sonography was 70.3% (Cl: 0.34 (0.22-0.46)), while the agreement of Barlow test was 78.5% (CI: 0-0.26). The Kendall’s coe!cient of concordance between reducible hip (Ortolani positive) under dynamic sonography and PE was 0.546. Dynamic sonographic evaluation of 238 hips with restricted hip abduction showed that 78 (32.7%) were subluxated at rest and/or subluxated with stress, and the remaining 150 (67.3%) hips were dislocated at rest or dislocated with stress. Conclusion: The agreement between PE and dynamic sonography was fair to moderate. The clinicians should focus on both examinations to reveal essential data for diagnosing and monitoring infants with DDH. Cite this article as: Imerci A, Thacker M, I, Bowen R. Agreement between physical examination and dynamic sonography in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2025;59(1):45-48.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Published
2025-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2025.23036
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agreement between physical examination and dynamic sonography in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Ahmet İmerci, Mihir M. Thacker, R.J. Bowen
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Hip disorders and treatments
article

Agreement between physical examination and dynamic sonography in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Ahmet İmerci, Mihir M. Thacker, R.J. Bowen
article en

Abstract

Objective: For years, physical examination (PE) findings (e.g., Barlow, Ortolani tests, and abduction limitation) have been used as theprimary screening method in the early diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). There are a limited number of studies in the literature that evaluate the agreement of PE findings and dynamic sonographic evaluation. Our aim was to evaluate the correlation between dynamic sonographic hip types and physical examination findings in infants with DDH. Methods: A total of 281 infants (562 hips) with DDH younger than 6 months who were given Pavlik harness treatment were includedin the study. Socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, and race) of the infants were recorded. The concordance betweenthe PE findings and sonographic findings of the patients at the first admission was evaluated. The agreement analysis between thedynamic sonography evaluations and the PE results was demonstrated by Cohen’s kappa (k) coe!cient and Kendall’s coe!cient (W) ofconcordance. Results: Of the 55 hips evaluated as normal in PE, 21 were normal, 25 were found to have dysplasia, and 9 were subluxated/or subluxatable on dynamic sonography. It was observed that 30 (13%) of 219 hips which were dislocated on dynamic sonography were found to be lax on the PE. The overall percentage of agreement between the physical examination and dynamic sonography was 72.4. The Cohen kappa for agreement between the PE and dynamic sonography was 0.541 (CI: 0.479-0.602). The agreement between Ortolani test evaluation with PE and Ortolani test evaluation of patients diagnosed with dislocated hip by dynamic sonography was 70.3% (Cl: 0.34 (0.22-0.46)), while the agreement of Barlow test was 78.5% (CI: 0-0.26). The Kendall’s coe!cient of concordance between reducible hip (Ortolani positive) under dynamic sonography and PE was 0.546. Dynamic sonographic evaluation of 238 hips with restricted hip abduction showed that 78 (32.7%) were subluxated at rest and/or subluxated with stress, and the remaining 150 (67.3%) hips were dislocated at rest or dislocated with stress. Conclusion: The agreement between PE and dynamic sonography was fair to moderate. The clinicians should focus on both examinations to reveal essential data for diagnosing and monitoring infants with DDH. Cite this article as: Imerci A, Thacker M, I, Bowen R. Agreement between physical examination and dynamic sonography in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2025;59(1):45-48.

Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica TurcicaVol. 59(1)
Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children (US), Muğla University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.