Frontline responders: Rethinking indicators of compromise for industrial control system security

Industrial Control Systems (ICSs), widely employed in many critical infrastructure sectors that manage and control physical processes (e.g., energy, water, transportation), face heightened security risks due to increased digitization and connectivity. Monitoring Indicators of Compromise (IoCs), observable signs of intrusion, such as unusual network activity or unauthorized system changes, are crucial for early detection and response to malicious activities, including data breaches and insider threats. While IoCs have been extensively studied in traditional Information Technology (IT), their effectiveness and suitability for the unique challenges of ICS environments, which directly control physical processes, remain unclear. Moreover, the influence of human factors (e.g., sociotechnical factors, usability) on the utilization and interpretation of IoCs for attack prevention in ICSs is not well understood. To address this gap, we conducted two studies involving 52 ICS security professionals. In an IoC Applicability study (n=32), we explore the relevance of existing IoCs within ICS environments and investigate factors contributing to potential ambiguities in their interpretation. We examine the perceived value, effort required for the collection, and volatility of various data sources used for IoC identification. Participants in the IoC Applicability Study emphasized the significant role of human factors in recognizing and interpreting IoCs for threat mitigation within ICS ecosystems. Based on this insight, we conducted a Socio-technical Factors in Recognition and Detection study (n=20) to investigate the impact of human factors on threat detection and explore the sociotechnical factors that influence the effective utilization of IoCs. Our results show significant discrepancies between conventional IT-based IoCs and their applicability to ICS environments, along with various socio-technical challenges (e.g., alert overload and desensitization). Our study provides pointers to rethinking the specific operational, technological, and human aspects of IoCs within the ICS context. Our findings provide insights for the development of ICS-specific IoC to enable security analysts to better respond to potential threats in industrial environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Security
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2025.104421
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frontline responders: Rethinking indicators of compromise for industrial control system security

Z. Berkay Celik, Neetesh Saxena, Arjun Arunasalam, Mohammed Asiri
Computers & Security
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
article

Frontline responders: Rethinking indicators of compromise for industrial control system security

Z. Berkay Celik, Neetesh Saxena, Arjun Arunasalam, Mohammed Asiri
article en

Abstract

Industrial Control Systems (ICSs), widely employed in many critical infrastructure sectors that manage and control physical processes (e.g., energy, water, transportation), face heightened security risks due to increased digitization and connectivity. Monitoring Indicators of Compromise (IoCs), observable signs of intrusion, such as unusual network activity or unauthorized system changes, are crucial for early detection and response to malicious activities, including data breaches and insider threats. While IoCs have been extensively studied in traditional Information Technology (IT), their effectiveness and suitability for the unique challenges of ICS environments, which directly control physical processes, remain unclear. Moreover, the influence of human factors (e.g., sociotechnical factors, usability) on the utilization and interpretation of IoCs for attack prevention in ICSs is not well understood. To address this gap, we conducted two studies involving 52 ICS security professionals. In an IoC Applicability study (n=32), we explore the relevance of existing IoCs within ICS environments and investigate factors contributing to potential ambiguities in their interpretation. We examine the perceived value, effort required for the collection, and volatility of various data sources used for IoC identification. Participants in the IoC Applicability Study emphasized the significant role of human factors in recognizing and interpreting IoCs for threat mitigation within ICS ecosystems. Based on this insight, we conducted a Socio-technical Factors in Recognition and Detection study (n=20) to investigate the impact of human factors on threat detection and explore the sociotechnical factors that influence the effective utilization of IoCs. Our results show significant discrepancies between conventional IT-based IoCs and their applicability to ICS environments, along with various socio-technical challenges (e.g., alert overload and desensitization). Our study provides pointers to rethinking the specific operational, technological, and human aspects of IoCs within the ICS context. Our findings provide insights for the development of ICS-specific IoC to enable security analysts to better respond to potential threats in industrial environments.

Computers & SecurityVol. 154
Cardiff University (GB)
National Science Foundation, British Council, UK-India Education and Research Initiative
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.