Ceftaroline + Rifampin Versus Vancomycin + Rifampin in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Meningitis in an Experimental Rabbit Model

<b><i>Background/Aim:</i></b> To compare the effectiveness ceftaroline-rifampicin (CR) and vancomycin-rifampicin (VR), against methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) in a rabbit meningitis model, to compare the effects on brain tissues in terms of inflammation and apoptosis and to test the antibiotics via in vitro time-kill and synergy tests. <b><i>Method:</i></b> Meningitis was induced using MRSA strain ATCC 43300. After 28 hours, the rabbits were split into three groups: control, VR, and CR. A CSF culture was taken at the start (<i>T</i><sub>0</sub>) and end of treatment (EOT)-the 24th hour of treatment. At EOT, the animals' brain tissues were examined for inflammation and apoptosis. The study strain was tested for a 24-hour time kill assay. <b><i>Results:</i></b> At the EOT, statistically significant differences were observed between the treatment groups in terms of reducing the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) bacterial count, achieving partial or complete treatment response, and exhibiting lower levels of neuronal apoptosis compared with the control group. However, there was no significant difference in all three parameters and in survival between the two treatment groups. The CR group exhibited a noticeable decrease in inflammation than the control group, but no significant difference was found between the control group versus VR and VR versus CR group. Rifampicin did not improve antibacterial efficacy in the in vitro time-kill assay. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The CR arm showed better complete response and inflammation, but both treatments were similar in other parameters. CR combination was found as effective as VR combination for treating MRSA meningitis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Infections
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.069
Primary Topic
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ceftaroline + Rifampin Versus Vancomycin + Rifampin in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Meningitis in an Experimental Rabbit Model

Sercan Ulusoy, Elif Doyuk Kartal, Yiğit Uyanıkgil, Berke Gökkılıç et al.
Surgical Infections
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
article

Ceftaroline + Rifampin Versus Vancomycin + Rifampin in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Meningitis in an Experimental Rabbit Model

Sercan Ulusoy, Elif Doyuk Kartal, Yiğit Uyanıkgil, Berke Gökkılıç, Oğuz Reşat Sıpahı, Canberk Tomruk, Dilşah Başkol Elik, Hüsnü Pullukçu, Damla Akdağ, Bilgin Arda, Tansu Yamazhan, Şöhret Aydemir, Hilal Sipahi, Tuncer Turhan, Meltem ÇİÇEKLİOĞLU, Elif Bolat, Gamze Sanlıdag-Isbilen, Furkan Isbilen
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Background/Aim:</i></b> To compare the effectiveness ceftaroline-rifampicin (CR) and vancomycin-rifampicin (VR), against methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) in a rabbit meningitis model, to compare the effects on brain tissues in terms of inflammation and apoptosis and to test the antibiotics via in vitro time-kill and synergy tests. <b><i>Method:</i></b> Meningitis was induced using MRSA strain ATCC 43300. After 28 hours, the rabbits were split into three groups: control, VR, and CR. A CSF culture was taken at the start (<i>T</i><sub>0</sub>) and end of treatment (EOT)-the 24th hour of treatment. At EOT, the animals' brain tissues were examined for inflammation and apoptosis. The study strain was tested for a 24-hour time kill assay. <b><i>Results:</i></b> At the EOT, statistically significant differences were observed between the treatment groups in terms of reducing the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) bacterial count, achieving partial or complete treatment response, and exhibiting lower levels of neuronal apoptosis compared with the control group. However, there was no significant difference in all three parameters and in survival between the two treatment groups. The CR group exhibited a noticeable decrease in inflammation than the control group, but no significant difference was found between the control group versus VR and VR versus CR group. Rifampicin did not improve antibacterial efficacy in the in vitro time-kill assay. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The CR arm showed better complete response and inflammation, but both treatments were similar in other parameters. CR combination was found as effective as VR combination for treating MRSA meningitis.

Surgical InfectionsVol. 26(6)
Ankara University (TR), Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University (TR), Ege University (TR), Sivas State Hospital (TR), King Hamad University Hospital (BH), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.