INTERNATIONAL MEDIA FRAMING OF THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI WAR

The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a complex and multifaceted issue that has persisted for decades. The violent incidents that erupted on October 7, 2023, have significant global repercussions. This study analyzes the framing employed in the headlines and subheadings regarding the Palestinian-Israeli conflict during the initial five days of the outbreak, as well as how these frames relate to the editorial policies of major newspapers. The research focuses on The New York Times, The Guardian, Hürriyet, and Taz, published in the USA, England, Turkey, and Germany, respectively. The analysis revealed that Hürriyet, representing Turkey, utilized frames that reinforced neutrality in the early days of the conflict. Conversely, The New York Times, The Guardian, and Taz predominantly employed frames that favored Israel in their coverage. Overall, we found that Hürriyet and the other sample newspapers did not present the news with complete impartiality and objectivity in accordance with journalistic principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1615156
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTERNATIONAL MEDIA FRAMING OF THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI WAR

Mehmet Akif Günay
3 citations
The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication
Media Studies and Communication
11.59
article

INTERNATIONAL MEDIA FRAMING OF THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI WAR

Mehmet Akif Günay
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a complex and multifaceted issue that has persisted for decades. The violent incidents that erupted on October 7, 2023, have significant global repercussions. This study analyzes the framing employed in the headlines and subheadings regarding the Palestinian-Israeli conflict during the initial five days of the outbreak, as well as how these frames relate to the editorial policies of major newspapers. The research focuses on The New York Times, The Guardian, Hürriyet, and Taz, published in the USA, England, Turkey, and Germany, respectively. The analysis revealed that Hürriyet, representing Turkey, utilized frames that reinforced neutrality in the early days of the conflict. Conversely, The New York Times, The Guardian, and Taz predominantly employed frames that favored Israel in their coverage. Overall, we found that Hürriyet and the other sample newspapers did not present the news with complete impartiality and objectivity in accordance with journalistic principles.

The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and CommunicationVol. 15(2)
Gümüşhane University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Media Studies and Communication
11.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

INTERNATIONAL MEDIA FRAMING OF THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI WAR — Mehmet Akif Günay · The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS