Rethink biosolids: Risks and opportunities in the circular economy

• Biosolids are not suitable for land applications due to the embedded emerging pollutants. • Biosolids offer limited nutrient value in relation to society’s overall nutrient demand. • Innovative valorization strategies are worth exploring, including carbon capture and storage. • Holistic life-cycle assessments are needed for these novel biosolids management strategies. Biosolids are a byproduct of wastewater treatment with potential value because of their rich nutrient, organic matter, and mineral content. However, due to the environmental and public health risks posed by contaminants, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), micro-/nano-plastics (MNPs), and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), the conventional practice of applying biosolids to land, especially on agricultural lands, can be unsustainable. These contaminants can accumulate in soil, disrupt ecosystems, and pose long-term risks to food safety and human health. Through the lens of a circular economy, biosolids should be valorized through holistic and sustainable approaches that prioritize both environmental protection and resource recovery. Advanced technologies, such as anaerobic membrane bioreactors, pyrolysis, and hydrothermal liquefaction, can extract valuable resources, such as energy and bioplastics, while also destroying harmful contaminants. In addition, biosolids and biosolids-derived biochar hold untapped potential for carbon capture and storage (CCS), offering a sustainable alternative to land applications while also helping mitigate climate change. Hence, a circular economy approach not only minimizes waste and reduces environmental impacts but also unlocks an important potential of biosolids as a renewable resource moving forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.161749
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethink biosolids: Risks and opportunities in the circular economy

John P. Giesy, Feng Xiao, Edward Arthur McBean, Jinyong Liu et al.
22 citations
Chemical Engineering Journal
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
11.08
article

Rethink biosolids: Risks and opportunities in the circular economy

John P. Giesy, Feng Xiao, Edward Arthur McBean, Jinyong Liu, Hyeong‐Moo Shin, Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng, Bing‐Jie Ni, Jinkai Xue, Daqian Jiang, Willy Verstraete, Zhenyu Li, Liu Yang, Guneet Kaur, Leah Chibwe, Yoshitaka Uchida
article en
22 citations

Abstract

• Biosolids are not suitable for land applications due to the embedded emerging pollutants. • Biosolids offer limited nutrient value in relation to society’s overall nutrient demand. • Innovative valorization strategies are worth exploring, including carbon capture and storage. • Holistic life-cycle assessments are needed for these novel biosolids management strategies. Biosolids are a byproduct of wastewater treatment with potential value because of their rich nutrient, organic matter, and mineral content. However, due to the environmental and public health risks posed by contaminants, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), micro-/nano-plastics (MNPs), and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), the conventional practice of applying biosolids to land, especially on agricultural lands, can be unsustainable. These contaminants can accumulate in soil, disrupt ecosystems, and pose long-term risks to food safety and human health. Through the lens of a circular economy, biosolids should be valorized through holistic and sustainable approaches that prioritize both environmental protection and resource recovery. Advanced technologies, such as anaerobic membrane bioreactors, pyrolysis, and hydrothermal liquefaction, can extract valuable resources, such as energy and bioplastics, while also destroying harmful contaminants. In addition, biosolids and biosolids-derived biochar hold untapped potential for carbon capture and storage (CCS), offering a sustainable alternative to land applications while also helping mitigate climate change. Hence, a circular economy approach not only minimizes waste and reduces environmental impacts but also unlocks an important potential of biosolids as a renewable resource moving forward.

Chemical Engineering JournalVol. 510
University of California, Riverside (US), Baylor University (US), Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of Alabama (US), University of Regina (CA), Hokkaido University (JP), UNSW Sydney (AU), Ghent University (BE), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Saudi Water Authority (SA), University of Missouri (US), University of Guelph (CA), Michigan State University (US)
Baylor University, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
11.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.