Osseo-integration potential of zirconia versus titanium implants

The success of dental implants depends on osseo-integration because titanium (Ti) maintains good mechanical stability while zirconia (Zr) prevents bacterial adhesion. The early-stage adhesion of MG-63 osteo-blast-like cells to Ti surfaces reached 78% ± 2.5% during the initial period (p<0.05). However, Zr demonstrated superior long-term cell proliferation and mineralization throughout the analysis period (p<0.05). The alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels at day 7 remained comparable between Ti (1.25 ± 0.09 U/mL) and Zr (1.18 ± 0.07 U/mL) while Zr showed better growth of mineralized surface at day 14. Nonetheless, additional testing using animal subjects are required to confirm Zr as a suitable substitute for Ti implants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioinformation
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300210161
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Osseo-integration potential of zirconia versus titanium implants

Sameer Gupta, Sanjeev Thakur, N. Sathish, Deepak Sharma et al.
Bioinformation
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Osseo-integration potential of zirconia versus titanium implants

Sameer Gupta, Sanjeev Thakur, N. Sathish, Deepak Sharma, Shantanu Kumar Kar, Pratesh Dholabhai
article en

Abstract

The success of dental implants depends on osseo-integration because titanium (Ti) maintains good mechanical stability while zirconia (Zr) prevents bacterial adhesion. The early-stage adhesion of MG-63 osteo-blast-like cells to Ti surfaces reached 78% ± 2.5% during the initial period (p<0.05). However, Zr demonstrated superior long-term cell proliferation and mineralization throughout the analysis period (p<0.05). The alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels at day 7 remained comparable between Ti (1.25 ± 0.09 U/mL) and Zr (1.18 ± 0.07 U/mL) while Zr showed better growth of mineralized surface at day 14. Nonetheless, additional testing using animal subjects are required to confirm Zr as a suitable substitute for Ti implants.

BioinformationVol. 21(2)
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN), Dabur Research Foundation (India) (IN), Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN), Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital (IN), KM Shah Dental College and Hospital (IN), Seema Dental College and Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Osseo-integration potential of zirconia versus titanium implants — Sameer Gupta, Sanjeev Thakur, et al. · Bioinformation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS