High-frequency vessel noise can mask porpoise echolocation

Ultrasonic cavitation noise from fast vessels overlaps spectrally with echolocation clicks of toothed whales and therefore has the potential to degrade echolocation performance through auditory masking of returning echoes. Here, we tested that hypothesis by exposing two trained echolocating porpoises carrying DTAGs to two different levels of decidecade noise centered on 2 kHz (non-masking) and 125 kHz (masking) during an active target discrimination task. We found no click level adjustments or effects on discrimination performance in trials with non-masking noise or low-level masking noise. However, when exposed to high-level masking noise of 113±3 dB re. 1 µPa root mean square (RMS), the porpoises increased their mean click source levels by 7-17 dB. Despite this Lombard response of 0.2-0.5 dBsignal/dBnoise, and longer time and more clicks used by the porpoises to perform the task in noise, both animals were still significantly poorer at discriminating the targets (64-85% success rate) than in the other treatments (94-100%), thus demonstrating adverse masking effects. When the porpoises were offered spatial release from masking by relocating the noise source off-axis relative to the animal-to-target axis, echolocation performance was regained. We conclude that moderate levels of high-frequency noise, such as from cavitating vessel propellers several hundred meters from a vessel, can mask porpoise echolocation in a way that cannot be fully compensated for. As biosonar is vital for foraging and navigation around hazards such as gillnets for porpoises and other toothed whales, this study highlights that masking effects should be considered in impact assessments of cavitating vessels around echolocating toothed whales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.249963
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-frequency vessel noise can mask porpoise echolocation

Jakob Tougaard, Peter T. Madsen, Pernille Tønnesen, Chloë Malinka et al.
9 citations
Journal of Experimental Biology
Marine animal studies overview
15.45
article

High-frequency vessel noise can mask porpoise echolocation

Jakob Tougaard, Peter T. Madsen, Pernille Tønnesen, Chloë Malinka, Laia Rojano‐Doñate, Line Hermannsen, Peter L. Tyack, Michael Ladegaard, Kristian Beedholm
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Ultrasonic cavitation noise from fast vessels overlaps spectrally with echolocation clicks of toothed whales and therefore has the potential to degrade echolocation performance through auditory masking of returning echoes. Here, we tested that hypothesis by exposing two trained echolocating porpoises carrying DTAGs to two different levels of decidecade noise centered on 2 kHz (non-masking) and 125 kHz (masking) during an active target discrimination task. We found no click level adjustments or effects on discrimination performance in trials with non-masking noise or low-level masking noise. However, when exposed to high-level masking noise of 113±3 dB re. 1 µPa root mean square (RMS), the porpoises increased their mean click source levels by 7-17 dB. Despite this Lombard response of 0.2-0.5 dBsignal/dBnoise, and longer time and more clicks used by the porpoises to perform the task in noise, both animals were still significantly poorer at discriminating the targets (64-85% success rate) than in the other treatments (94-100%), thus demonstrating adverse masking effects. When the porpoises were offered spatial release from masking by relocating the noise source off-axis relative to the animal-to-target axis, echolocation performance was regained. We conclude that moderate levels of high-frequency noise, such as from cavitating vessel propellers several hundred meters from a vessel, can mask porpoise echolocation in a way that cannot be fully compensated for. As biosonar is vital for foraging and navigation around hazards such as gillnets for porpoises and other toothed whales, this study highlights that masking effects should be considered in impact assessments of cavitating vessels around echolocating toothed whales.

Journal of Experimental BiologyVol. 228(6)
Aarhus University (DK), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Natur og Univers, Det Frie Forskningsråd, Office of Naval Research
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Marine animal studies overview
15.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.