THE EVOLUTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT THROUGH SHIFTING PARADIGMS

Management paradigms have evolved alongside the development of change management, each responding to organizational challenges in adapting to new realities. Thomas Kuhn’s theory of paradigm shifts offers a conceptual framework to understand these transitions, where dominant approaches persist until anomalies provoke revolutionary changes. This perspective is particularly relevant in today’s dynamic environments shaped by globalization and technological advancement. Purpose. This study explores the evolution of management paradigms within the context of change management, applying Kuhn’s framework to analyze their progression. It evaluates contributions from key thinkers – Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Elton Mayo, Douglas McGregor, and W. Edwards Deming – emphasizing the growing importance of Paradoxical Thinking as a framework for managing complexity and uncertainty. Special focus is placed on the IT sector, where adaptability is crucial for driving successful change. Materials and Methods. The study applies Kuhn’s paradigm shift theory to trace the historical development of management thought. Foundational works are analyzed to evaluate each paradigm’s contributions to change management practices, identifying achievements and exposing limitations. Results. Management paradigms, from Scientific Management to Agile Methodologies, introduced innovative approaches to organizational challenges but revealed inherent shortcomings. Scientific Management optimized efficiency but neglected human dynamics, leading to subsequent paradigms like Administrative Management and the Human Relations Movement. Systems Thinking and Lean Management later emphasized adaptability but left unresolved tensions. Paradoxical Thinking and Polarity Management represent a culmination of this evolution, providing effective approach to navigate inherent contradictions and drive innovation in organizational change. Prospects. Paradoxical Thinking enables organizations to transform tensions into opportunities for innovation and sustainable adaptability. By balancing competing priorities, it equips organizations to excel in environments of rapid and constant change, particularly in IT sectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Управління змінами та інновації
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32782/cmi/2025-13-12
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE EVOLUTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT THROUGH SHIFTING PARADIGMS

Halyna Luchko, Олег Дугін
Управління змінами та інновації
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

THE EVOLUTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT THROUGH SHIFTING PARADIGMS

Halyna Luchko, Олег Дугін
article en

Abstract

Management paradigms have evolved alongside the development of change management, each responding to organizational challenges in adapting to new realities. Thomas Kuhn’s theory of paradigm shifts offers a conceptual framework to understand these transitions, where dominant approaches persist until anomalies provoke revolutionary changes. This perspective is particularly relevant in today’s dynamic environments shaped by globalization and technological advancement. Purpose. This study explores the evolution of management paradigms within the context of change management, applying Kuhn’s framework to analyze their progression. It evaluates contributions from key thinkers – Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Elton Mayo, Douglas McGregor, and W. Edwards Deming – emphasizing the growing importance of Paradoxical Thinking as a framework for managing complexity and uncertainty. Special focus is placed on the IT sector, where adaptability is crucial for driving successful change. Materials and Methods. The study applies Kuhn’s paradigm shift theory to trace the historical development of management thought. Foundational works are analyzed to evaluate each paradigm’s contributions to change management practices, identifying achievements and exposing limitations. Results. Management paradigms, from Scientific Management to Agile Methodologies, introduced innovative approaches to organizational challenges but revealed inherent shortcomings. Scientific Management optimized efficiency but neglected human dynamics, leading to subsequent paradigms like Administrative Management and the Human Relations Movement. Systems Thinking and Lean Management later emphasized adaptability but left unresolved tensions. Paradoxical Thinking and Polarity Management represent a culmination of this evolution, providing effective approach to navigate inherent contradictions and drive innovation in organizational change. Prospects. Paradoxical Thinking enables organizations to transform tensions into opportunities for innovation and sustainable adaptability. By balancing competing priorities, it equips organizations to excel in environments of rapid and constant change, particularly in IT sectors.

Управління змінами та інновації(13)
Lviv Polytechnic National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.