What Works for Active Labor Market Policies? A Meta-Analysis of RCT Findings

The past 10 years have witnessed a flurry of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that shed new light on the impact and cost-effectiveness of Active Labor Market Policies (ALMPs) that aim to improve workers’ access to new jobs and better wages. This paper presents the first systematic review of 102 ALMP RCTs comprising a total of 668 estimated impacts. We find that (i) a third of these estimates are positive and statistically significant (PSS) at conventional levels; (ii) programs are more likely to yield positive results when GDP growth is higher and unemployment is lower; (iii) programs aimed at building human capital, such as vocational training, independent worker assistance and wage subsidies, show significant positive impact; and (iv) program length, monetary incentives, individualized follow up and activity targeting are all key features in determining the effectiveness of the interventions.   JEL Classification Codes: J21; J48; E24

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Economía
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31389/eco.450
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Works for Active Labor Market Policies? A Meta-Analysis of RCT Findings

Luca Sartorio, Eduardo Levy Levy-Yeyati, Alfonso Gauna, Martín Montané
1 citations
Economía
Employment and Welfare Studies
2.82
article

What Works for Active Labor Market Policies? A Meta-Analysis of RCT Findings

Luca Sartorio, Eduardo Levy Levy-Yeyati, Alfonso Gauna, Martín Montané
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The past 10 years have witnessed a flurry of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that shed new light on the impact and cost-effectiveness of Active Labor Market Policies (ALMPs) that aim to improve workers’ access to new jobs and better wages. This paper presents the first systematic review of 102 ALMP RCTs comprising a total of 668 estimated impacts. We find that (i) a third of these estimates are positive and statistically significant (PSS) at conventional levels; (ii) programs are more likely to yield positive results when GDP growth is higher and unemployment is lower; (iii) programs aimed at building human capital, such as vocational training, independent worker assistance and wage subsidies, show significant positive impact; and (iv) program length, monetary incentives, individualized follow up and activity targeting are all key features in determining the effectiveness of the interventions.   JEL Classification Codes: J21; J48; E24

EconomíaVol. 24(1)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Employment and Welfare Studies
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.