A system view of how balancing sociotechnical factors in Industry 4.0 implementation: Evidence from interviews and ethnographic research

• A sociotechnical perspective to support Industry 4.0 in manufacturing is adopted. • 28 companies implementing Industry 4.0 technologies are analyzed. • A sociotechnical framework is proposed with interactions between different dimensions. • The findings show how to balance sociotechnical implementation for Industry 4.0. • The sociotechnical framework supports the transition from Industry 4.0 to 5.0. Industry 4.0 involves the incorporation of advanced digital technologies into manufacturing operations, bringing significant changes to social, technical, organizational, and environmental aspects of companies. However, there is limited knowledge of how companies manage these changes. This study aims to discuss how companies develop the necessary sociotechnical factors for successfully implementing Industry 4.0 and the mechanisms driving these changes. The study considers this as an initial stage towards transitioning to an Industry 5.0 concept, which integrates workers and technologies in a balanced system. A qualitative approach, including cross-case and ethnographic analyses, was employed to identify the various sociotechnical enabling factors with 28 companies implementing Industry 4.0 technologies. The results highlight strategic guidelines developed by companies, such as top management support and open innovation with partners and startups. Companies can start by defining an implementation roadmap, training leaders in technical concepts with technology providers and technical schools and providing management support with company-wide programs for Industry 4.0. Additionally, the study describes how hierarchical flexibility, increased autonomy for workers through participation in decision processes, data training, and open communication are developed. Interactions between dimensions include upskilling workers with technology providers, aligning technologies with worker profiles and tasks, and incorporating data collection and use into processes. Unlike previous research that has mainly addressed enabling factors for Industry 4.0 from an individual perspective, this study analyzes their interactions and discusses practical development within companies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2025.111047
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A system view of how balancing sociotechnical factors in Industry 4.0 implementation: Evidence from interviews and ethnographic research

Érico Marcon, Néstor Fabián Ayala, Marlon Soliman, Alejandro Germán Frank et al.
8 citations
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Digital Transformation in Industry
9.94
article

A system view of how balancing sociotechnical factors in Industry 4.0 implementation: Evidence from interviews and ethnographic research

Érico Marcon, Néstor Fabián Ayala, Marlon Soliman, Alejandro Germán Frank, Timothy Sturgeon
article en
8 citations

Abstract

• A sociotechnical perspective to support Industry 4.0 in manufacturing is adopted. • 28 companies implementing Industry 4.0 technologies are analyzed. • A sociotechnical framework is proposed with interactions between different dimensions. • The findings show how to balance sociotechnical implementation for Industry 4.0. • The sociotechnical framework supports the transition from Industry 4.0 to 5.0. Industry 4.0 involves the incorporation of advanced digital technologies into manufacturing operations, bringing significant changes to social, technical, organizational, and environmental aspects of companies. However, there is limited knowledge of how companies manage these changes. This study aims to discuss how companies develop the necessary sociotechnical factors for successfully implementing Industry 4.0 and the mechanisms driving these changes. The study considers this as an initial stage towards transitioning to an Industry 5.0 concept, which integrates workers and technologies in a balanced system. A qualitative approach, including cross-case and ethnographic analyses, was employed to identify the various sociotechnical enabling factors with 28 companies implementing Industry 4.0 technologies. The results highlight strategic guidelines developed by companies, such as top management support and open innovation with partners and startups. Companies can start by defining an implementation roadmap, training leaders in technical concepts with technology providers and technical schools and providing management support with company-wide programs for Industry 4.0. Additionally, the study describes how hierarchical flexibility, increased autonomy for workers through participation in decision processes, data training, and open communication are developed. Interactions between dimensions include upskilling workers with technology providers, aligning technologies with worker profiles and tasks, and incorporating data collection and use into processes. Unlike previous research that has mainly addressed enabling factors for Industry 4.0 from an individual perspective, this study analyzes their interactions and discusses practical development within companies.

Computers & Industrial EngineeringVol. 203
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR), FIT Consulting (Italy) (IT), IIT@MIT (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Digital Transformation in Industry
9.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.