The Public and its Problems: Sacco and Vanzetti, Dewey, Dos Passos, and Activist Literary Publics in the 1920S

Abstract: This essay examines how the wave of authors' activism surrounding the Sacco and Vanzetti case engaged political philosophy of the 1920s diagnosing an American public sphere that was increasingly inhospitable to participatory democracy or able to debate issues of pressing national concern. Discussing work by John Dewey, Walter Lippmann, Nathan Asch, Edna St. Vincent Millay, and John Dos Passos, the essay examines their shared analysis of, and tentative solutions to, a 'crisis of the public' occasioned by new technologies, consumer distractions, and new media economies–a crisis that was impacting not only progressive democracy but the possibility of national justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ELH
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2025.a954022
Primary Topic
Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Public and its Problems: Sacco and Vanzetti, Dewey, Dos Passos, and Activist Literary Publics in the 1920S

Mark Whalan
ELH
Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
article

The Public and its Problems: Sacco and Vanzetti, Dewey, Dos Passos, and Activist Literary Publics in the 1920S

Mark Whalan
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This essay examines how the wave of authors' activism surrounding the Sacco and Vanzetti case engaged political philosophy of the 1920s diagnosing an American public sphere that was increasingly inhospitable to participatory democracy or able to debate issues of pressing national concern. Discussing work by John Dewey, Walter Lippmann, Nathan Asch, Edna St. Vincent Millay, and John Dos Passos, the essay examines their shared analysis of, and tentative solutions to, a 'crisis of the public' occasioned by new technologies, consumer distractions, and new media economies–a crisis that was impacting not only progressive democracy but the possibility of national justice.

ELHVol. 92(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.