Evaluating future mobility: back to the future in the UK policy?

Increasing urbanisation in the world economy in the last 50 years has produced a number of profound challenges for the organisation and management of economy and society. In recent years these challenges have been compounded by climate changes geo-political risk, uncertainty and consequent conflicts; disease pandemics; and, rising income and territorial inequalities, all of which have had profound consequences for mobility. For many policy makers and practitioners technological (mainly digital) solutions are promoted to address individual issues for what is a systemic problem. The UK appears to be a particular exemplar of this approach whose mainstream view of transport technologies is a backward view of the future. In contrast, the EC appears to be based upon a more socio-technical transition in which smart urban mobility within multi-modal systems, appears more suitable for the current and future challenges of mobility. This paper explores these issues in order to stimulate debate about future research in this crucial area of the social sciences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Social Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2025.2474948
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating future mobility: back to the future in the UK policy?

Leslie Budd
2 citations
Contemporary Social Science
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
article

Evaluating future mobility: back to the future in the UK policy?

Leslie Budd
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Increasing urbanisation in the world economy in the last 50 years has produced a number of profound challenges for the organisation and management of economy and society. In recent years these challenges have been compounded by climate changes geo-political risk, uncertainty and consequent conflicts; disease pandemics; and, rising income and territorial inequalities, all of which have had profound consequences for mobility. For many policy makers and practitioners technological (mainly digital) solutions are promoted to address individual issues for what is a systemic problem. The UK appears to be a particular exemplar of this approach whose mainstream view of transport technologies is a backward view of the future. In contrast, the EC appears to be based upon a more socio-technical transition in which smart urban mobility within multi-modal systems, appears more suitable for the current and future challenges of mobility. This paper explores these issues in order to stimulate debate about future research in this crucial area of the social sciences.

Contemporary Social ScienceVol. 20(1)
The Open University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating future mobility: back to the future in the UK policy? — Leslie Budd · Contemporary Social Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS