Does majority support for minority rights impact perceived norms and psychological well‐being? An application to the <scp>LGBTIQ</scp> + context

Abstract Several legislative changes following popular votes have transformed the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer (i.e., LGBTIQ+) people. We suggest these decisions to change laws serve as strong signals of public support (i.e., shifting the perceived societal norms), which may not only impact the well‐being of individuals directly targeted by these votes (LGBTIQ+ people) but also members of advantaged groups (cis‐heterosexual people) supporting or opposing such changes. Drawing on three preregistered analyses of longitudinal studies following votes in Switzerland (Study 1, 419 LGBTIQ+ people; Study 3, 619 LGBTIQ+ people and 247 cis‐heterosexual supporters) and Australia (Study 2, 189 cis‐heterosexual supporters and 195 cis‐heterosexual opponents), we find that legal changes extending LGBTIQ+ rights led to a positive shift in perceived norms. This positive shift also led to a change in the well‐being of LGBTIQ+ people in Study 1 but not in Study 3, suggesting that substantial variation in how people initially perceive the norm may be necessary for such changes to affect well‐being. No association was found between perceived norms and well‐being among cis‐heterosexual people in Studies 2 and 3. Together, these findings suggest that it is critical to focus on the socio‐psychological impacts of legal changes on people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Psychology
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70014
Citations
1
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does majority support for minority rights impact perceived norms and psychological well‐being? An application to the LGBTIQ + context

Tabea Häßler, Craig McGarty, Morgana Lizzio‐Wilson, Emma F. Thomas et al.
1 citations
Political Psychology
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
article

Does majority support for minority rights impact perceived norms and psychological well‐being? An application to the LGBTIQ + context

Tabea Häßler, Craig McGarty, Morgana Lizzio‐Wilson, Emma F. Thomas, Winnifred R. Louis, Léïla Eisner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Several legislative changes following popular votes have transformed the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer (i.e., LGBTIQ+) people. We suggest these decisions to change laws serve as strong signals of public support (i.e., shifting the perceived societal norms), which may not only impact the well‐being of individuals directly targeted by these votes (LGBTIQ+ people) but also members of advantaged groups (cis‐heterosexual people) supporting or opposing such changes. Drawing on three preregistered analyses of longitudinal studies following votes in Switzerland (Study 1, 419 LGBTIQ+ people; Study 3, 619 LGBTIQ+ people and 247 cis‐heterosexual supporters) and Australia (Study 2, 189 cis‐heterosexual supporters and 195 cis‐heterosexual opponents), we find that legal changes extending LGBTIQ+ rights led to a positive shift in perceived norms. This positive shift also led to a change in the well‐being of LGBTIQ+ people in Study 1 but not in Study 3, suggesting that substantial variation in how people initially perceive the norm may be necessary for such changes to affect well‐being. No association was found between perceived norms and well‐being among cis‐heterosexual people in Studies 2 and 3. Together, these findings suggest that it is critical to focus on the socio‐psychological impacts of legal changes on people.

Political PsychologyVol. 46(6)
The University of Queensland (AU), Flinders University (AU), Princeton University (US), University of Zurich (CH), University of Exeter (GB), Western Sydney University (AU)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.