Assessment of genetically modified maize DAS1131 (application GMFF‐2021‐1530)

Genetically modified maize DAS1131 was developed to confer resistance to certain susceptible lepidopteran pests, as well as tolerance to glyphosate herbicide, these properties were achieved by introducing the <i>cry1Da2</i> and <i>dgt-28 epsps</i> expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize DAS1131 and its conventional counterpart needs further assessment, except for crude fat in grain which does not raise safety and nutritional concerns. The Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the Cry1Da2 and DGT-28 EPSPS proteins as expressed in maize DAS1131 and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of maize DAS1131. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize DAS1131 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DAS1131 is as safe as the conventional counterpart and the non-GM maize varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of release of maize DAS1131 into the environment, including viable grains, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DAS1131. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DAS1131 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9282
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of genetically modified maize DAS1131 (application GMFF‐2021‐1530)

Arianna Ferrari, Giacomo De Sanctis, Paolo Lenzi, José Ángel Gómez Ruiz et al.
3 citations
EFSA Journal
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
5.25
article

Assessment of genetically modified maize DAS1131 (application GMFF‐2021‐1530)

Arianna Ferrari, Giacomo De Sanctis, Paolo Lenzi, José Ángel Gómez Ruiz, Aleksandra Lewandowska, Jean‐Luc Gallois, Ruud A. de Maagd, Francisco Barro, Alan H. Schulman, Antoine Messéan, Fabien Nogué, Tilemachos Goumperis, Frits Koning, Josep Casacuberta, Dafni Maria Kagkli, Pietro Piffanelli, Eve Veromann, Christoph C. Tebbe, Ana M. Camargo, Albert Braeuning, Paschalina Grammatikou, F. Javier Moreno, M. Epstein, Giovanni Savoini, Thomas Frenzel, Franco Maria Neri, Antonio Fernández Dumont, Michele Ardizzone, Tommaso Raffaello, Andrea Gennaro, Pilar Cubas
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Genetically modified maize DAS1131 was developed to confer resistance to certain susceptible lepidopteran pests, as well as tolerance to glyphosate herbicide, these properties were achieved by introducing the <i>cry1Da2</i> and <i>dgt-28 epsps</i> expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize DAS1131 and its conventional counterpart needs further assessment, except for crude fat in grain which does not raise safety and nutritional concerns. The Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the Cry1Da2 and DGT-28 EPSPS proteins as expressed in maize DAS1131 and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of maize DAS1131. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize DAS1131 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DAS1131 is as safe as the conventional counterpart and the non-GM maize varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of release of maize DAS1131 into the environment, including viable grains, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DAS1131. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DAS1131 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

EFSA JournalVol. 23(3)
John Innes Centre (GB), European Food Safety Authority (IT), University of Helsinki (FI), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), University of Padua (IT), Estonian University of Life Sciences (EE), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (DE), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institute for Biodiversity (DE), Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition (FR), Département agronomie et sciences de l'environnement pour les agroécosystèmes (FR), Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (FR), Génétique et amélioration des fruits et légumes (FR), Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible (ES), Center for Research in Agricultural Genomics (ES), Saxon State Ministry for Science and the Arts (DE), Laboratoire de Psychologie et d’Ergonomie Appliquées (FR), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), Universidad de Sevilla (ES), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.