Evaluating the Impact of Generative AI on Intelligent Programming Assistance and Code Quality.

Generative AI is revolutionizing software development by providing intelligent programming assistance, automating code generation, debugging, and refactoring. This paper evaluates the impact of AI-powered coding assistants, such as GitHub Copilot and OpenAI Codex, on developer productivity and code quality. We analyze AI’s effectiveness in improving coding efficiency, reducing errors, and maintaining best practices while addressing challenges such as bias, over-reliance, and security risks. Our study compares AI-assisted and human-written code using empirical data and controlled experiments across multiple programming languages. Key metrics, including defect rates, maintainability, and adherence to industry standards, are used to assess AI’s influence on code quality. Additionally, we explore its implications for software engineering workflows, education, and future advancements in AI-driven development. Findings reveal that AI-assisted coding enhances productivity but requires human oversight to mitigate risks like code vulnerabilities and inconsistencies. This research provides valuable insights into AI’s evolving role in software engineering, offering guidance for developers, researchers, and industry practitioners. DOI:https://doi.org/10.52783/pst.1668

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Power System Technology
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/pst.1668
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Impact of Generative AI on Intelligent Programming Assistance and Code Quality.

Magnus Chukwuebuka Ahuchogu
Power System Technology
Software Engineering Research
article

Evaluating the Impact of Generative AI on Intelligent Programming Assistance and Code Quality.

Magnus Chukwuebuka Ahuchogu
article en

Abstract

Generative AI is revolutionizing software development by providing intelligent programming assistance, automating code generation, debugging, and refactoring. This paper evaluates the impact of AI-powered coding assistants, such as GitHub Copilot and OpenAI Codex, on developer productivity and code quality. We analyze AI’s effectiveness in improving coding efficiency, reducing errors, and maintaining best practices while addressing challenges such as bias, over-reliance, and security risks. Our study compares AI-assisted and human-written code using empirical data and controlled experiments across multiple programming languages. Key metrics, including defect rates, maintainability, and adherence to industry standards, are used to assess AI’s influence on code quality. Additionally, we explore its implications for software engineering workflows, education, and future advancements in AI-driven development. Findings reveal that AI-assisted coding enhances productivity but requires human oversight to mitigate risks like code vulnerabilities and inconsistencies. This research provides valuable insights into AI’s evolving role in software engineering, offering guidance for developers, researchers, and industry practitioners. DOI:https://doi.org/10.52783/pst.1668

Power System TechnologyVol. 49(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.