The Effect of Micro-Focused Ultrasound Treatment on Intradermal Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injection and micro-focused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) are becoming increasingly popular for various esthetic conditions. However, performing MFU-V subsequently to BoNT-A injection may diminish the efficacy of BoNT-A. Previous reports have indicated the impact of various energy-based devices on BoNT-A. Nevertheless, the influence of MFU-V on BoNT-A has yet to be investigated. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the effect of MFU-V on BoNT-A injection and to determine the optimal interval between each treatment. A randomized controlled study was conducted on 15 subjects. Each participant was assigned to receive four sites of intradermal BoNT-A injection on their forehead. Following BoNT-A injection, these locations were randomized to receive either no MFU-V treatment or further treatment with MFU-V (superficial transducer, 10.0 MHz, 1.5 mm) on the same day, Day 7, or Day 14. On Day 28 following injection, the anhidrosis area was measured using the iodine starch test to objectively evaluate the result. In comparison to the control site (1.10 cm<sup>2</sup>), the anhidrotic area was significantly smaller in all MFU-V treated sites (0.74 cm<sup>2</sup> in immediate MFU-V treatment, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 0.90 cm<sup>2</sup> in MFU-V Day 7, <i>p</i> = 0.005; 0.93 cm<sup>2</sup> in MFU-V Day 14, <i>p</i> = 0.021). There were no serious and esthetic complications reported in our study. <b>In conclusion,</b> MFU-V with a superficial depth transducer significantly reduced the efficacy of intradermal BoNT-A injection, especially within two weeks following BoNT-A injection. After BoNT-A injection, we recommend MFU-V treatment should be avoided for at least two weeks. Further study is required to evaluate the optimal interval between these two treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxins
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17030147
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Micro-Focused Ultrasound Treatment on Intradermal Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection

Vasanop Vachiramon, Natthachat Jurairattanaporn, Sarawin Harnchoowong
3 citations
Toxins
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
6.01
article

The Effect of Micro-Focused Ultrasound Treatment on Intradermal Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection

Vasanop Vachiramon, Natthachat Jurairattanaporn, Sarawin Harnchoowong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injection and micro-focused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) are becoming increasingly popular for various esthetic conditions. However, performing MFU-V subsequently to BoNT-A injection may diminish the efficacy of BoNT-A. Previous reports have indicated the impact of various energy-based devices on BoNT-A. Nevertheless, the influence of MFU-V on BoNT-A has yet to be investigated. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the effect of MFU-V on BoNT-A injection and to determine the optimal interval between each treatment. A randomized controlled study was conducted on 15 subjects. Each participant was assigned to receive four sites of intradermal BoNT-A injection on their forehead. Following BoNT-A injection, these locations were randomized to receive either no MFU-V treatment or further treatment with MFU-V (superficial transducer, 10.0 MHz, 1.5 mm) on the same day, Day 7, or Day 14. On Day 28 following injection, the anhidrosis area was measured using the iodine starch test to objectively evaluate the result. In comparison to the control site (1.10 cm<sup>2</sup>), the anhidrotic area was significantly smaller in all MFU-V treated sites (0.74 cm<sup>2</sup> in immediate MFU-V treatment, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 0.90 cm<sup>2</sup> in MFU-V Day 7, <i>p</i> = 0.005; 0.93 cm<sup>2</sup> in MFU-V Day 14, <i>p</i> = 0.021). There were no serious and esthetic complications reported in our study. <b>In conclusion,</b> MFU-V with a superficial depth transducer significantly reduced the efficacy of intradermal BoNT-A injection, especially within two weeks following BoNT-A injection. After BoNT-A injection, we recommend MFU-V treatment should be avoided for at least two weeks. Further study is required to evaluate the optimal interval between these two treatments.

ToxinsVol. 17(3)
Mahidol University (TH), Ramathibodi Hospital (TH), Srinakharinwirot University (TH)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
6.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.