Predictive Factors and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Introduction: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the one of the leading causes of death in the United States and worldwide.In recent years, there has been a decline in the incidence and case fatality of AMI, which is partly attributed to the advancements in management including timely reperfusion and medical therapies.Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening complication in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and its development can be unpredictable.The aim of this study was to find independent predictive factors of CS in cohort of ACS patients.Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative, and analytical monocentric study, including 319 ACS patients admitted at Department of Surgery, 250 Bed District Sadar Hospital, Habiganj, Bangladesh from January to December 2024.Patients who presented with CS on admission were excluded from the study.This population was divided into two groups: the shock group patients eventually developed in-hospital CS and the no shock group which did not, and we compared overall patient characteristics and outcomes.Studied characteristics included patient demographics (age, sex), medical history (cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities), clinical status including the presence of heart failure (HF), electrocardiogram data, laboratory findings such as high-sensitivity troponin and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), echocardiographic findings mainly left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and lesions found during coronary angiography.Results: 319 ACS patients were included, among them 21 (6,6%) developed CS.Overall, the strongest predictive factors included the presence of acute heart failure on admission (OR = 14,83; 95% CI = 5,45 -40,32; p < 0,001), GRACE score 140 (OR = 9,03; 95% CI = 3,20 -25,46; p < 0,001), left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% (OR = 8,94; 95% CI = 3,08 -19,53; p < 0,001), eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy (OR = 9,78; 95% CI = 2,61 -36,70; p < 0,001), and right ventricular dysfunction (OR = 12,25; 95% CI = 2,55 -58,93; p = 0,002).Complications were more prevalent in the shock group with a higher mortality rate of 57,1%. Conclusion:CS in the setting of ACS is correlated with poorer prognosis and higher late mortality, justifying adequate and early diagnosis and management in high-risk patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Diseases
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22259/2638-4744.0701001
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Factors and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Prianka Saha, Moumita Roy, Mohammad Momin Uddin Chowdhury, Saima Hoque
Archives of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Diseases
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Predictive Factors and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Prianka Saha, Moumita Roy, Mohammad Momin Uddin Chowdhury, Saima Hoque
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the one of the leading causes of death in the United States and worldwide.In recent years, there has been a decline in the incidence and case fatality of AMI, which is partly attributed to the advancements in management including timely reperfusion and medical therapies.Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening complication in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and its development can be unpredictable.The aim of this study was to find independent predictive factors of CS in cohort of ACS patients.Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative, and analytical monocentric study, including 319 ACS patients admitted at Department of Surgery, 250 Bed District Sadar Hospital, Habiganj, Bangladesh from January to December 2024.Patients who presented with CS on admission were excluded from the study.This population was divided into two groups: the shock group patients eventually developed in-hospital CS and the no shock group which did not, and we compared overall patient characteristics and outcomes.Studied characteristics included patient demographics (age, sex), medical history (cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities), clinical status including the presence of heart failure (HF), electrocardiogram data, laboratory findings such as high-sensitivity troponin and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), echocardiographic findings mainly left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and lesions found during coronary angiography.Results: 319 ACS patients were included, among them 21 (6,6%) developed CS.Overall, the strongest predictive factors included the presence of acute heart failure on admission (OR = 14,83; 95% CI = 5,45 -40,32; p < 0,001), GRACE score 140 (OR = 9,03; 95% CI = 3,20 -25,46; p < 0,001), left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% (OR = 8,94; 95% CI = 3,08 -19,53; p < 0,001), eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy (OR = 9,78; 95% CI = 2,61 -36,70; p < 0,001), and right ventricular dysfunction (OR = 12,25; 95% CI = 2,55 -58,93; p = 0,002).Complications were more prevalent in the shock group with a higher mortality rate of 57,1%. Conclusion:CS in the setting of ACS is correlated with poorer prognosis and higher late mortality, justifying adequate and early diagnosis and management in high-risk patients.

Archives of Cardiology and Cardiovascular DiseasesVol. 7(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.