Understanding the Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Decision-Making in Early-Phase Dose-Finding Clinical Trials

In early-phase dose-finding clinical trials, integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is essential for enhancing patient-centered decision-making. This short communication advocates for several key practices to achieve such integration. Firstly, foster patient-centered communication that ensures patient understanding of the potential benefits of early-phase trials, thereby mitigating therapeutic misconceptions. Secondly, (a) facilitate partnerships to understand and address the underlying reasons for discrepancies between clinician and patient reports of adverse events and (b) facilitate partnerships among clinical trialists, statisticians, clinicians, patients, and advocates to gain diverse perspectives of adverse events and in so doing ensure that patients comprehend how their data will be used. Thirdly, optimize trial design and data collection by (a) determining optimal and feasible frequencies for PRO collection to minimize patient burden while maintaining data integrity and (b) effectively incorporating concordant PROs to guide dose recommendation decisions and adapt trial designs and statistical methods accordingly. Future research will involve investigating the application of these practices in patients within the Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center Catchment Area. By integrating these recommendations, early-phase dose-finding clinical trials have the potential to achieve more informed and patient-centered objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030176
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Decision-Making in Early-Phase Dose-Finding Clinical Trials

Emily Liu, Nolan A. Wages, Richard Brown, Arnethea L. Sutton et al.
3 citations
Current Oncology
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
7.89
article

Understanding the Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Decision-Making in Early-Phase Dose-Finding Clinical Trials

Emily Liu, Nolan A. Wages, Richard Brown, Arnethea L. Sutton, Andrew Poklepovic
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In early-phase dose-finding clinical trials, integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is essential for enhancing patient-centered decision-making. This short communication advocates for several key practices to achieve such integration. Firstly, foster patient-centered communication that ensures patient understanding of the potential benefits of early-phase trials, thereby mitigating therapeutic misconceptions. Secondly, (a) facilitate partnerships to understand and address the underlying reasons for discrepancies between clinician and patient reports of adverse events and (b) facilitate partnerships among clinical trialists, statisticians, clinicians, patients, and advocates to gain diverse perspectives of adverse events and in so doing ensure that patients comprehend how their data will be used. Thirdly, optimize trial design and data collection by (a) determining optimal and feasible frequencies for PRO collection to minimize patient burden while maintaining data integrity and (b) effectively incorporating concordant PROs to guide dose recommendation decisions and adapt trial designs and statistical methods accordingly. Future research will involve investigating the application of these practices in patients within the Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center Catchment Area. By integrating these recommendations, early-phase dose-finding clinical trials have the potential to achieve more informed and patient-centered objectives.

Current OncologyVol. 32(3)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
7.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.