Subnational Lobbying on National Policymaking: Evidence From Germany

ABSTRACT While research on subnational lobbying has advanced considerably in recent years, much less is known about the role of lower levels in the context of multilevel lobbying. In a multilevel system, interest groups can pursue different routes for influence‐seeking. These include a domestic subnational route to seek amendments on a bill by lobbying regional governments, and a subnational‐Brussels route , based on regions' influence on EU policymaking. Investigating the case of Germany, we analyze observational and survey data on interest groups and their route choices in the context of 23 legislative proposals that were drafted in the year 2019. Our findings highlight the importance of subnational lobbying for national policymaking. It is neither an exclusive strategy of outsiders on the national level, nor one pursued exclusively by local and regional actors. Furthermore, subnational lobbying is more likely when interest groups and subnational governments share common goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Governance
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70012
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subnational Lobbying on National Policymaking: Evidence From Germany

Patrick Bernhagen, Florian Spohr, Krispin Krüger
2 citations
Governance
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
4.45
article

Subnational Lobbying on National Policymaking: Evidence From Germany

Patrick Bernhagen, Florian Spohr, Krispin Krüger
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT While research on subnational lobbying has advanced considerably in recent years, much less is known about the role of lower levels in the context of multilevel lobbying. In a multilevel system, interest groups can pursue different routes for influence‐seeking. These include a domestic subnational route to seek amendments on a bill by lobbying regional governments, and a subnational‐Brussels route , based on regions' influence on EU policymaking. Investigating the case of Germany, we analyze observational and survey data on interest groups and their route choices in the context of 23 legislative proposals that were drafted in the year 2019. Our findings highlight the importance of subnational lobbying for national policymaking. It is neither an exclusive strategy of outsiders on the national level, nor one pursued exclusively by local and regional actors. Furthermore, subnational lobbying is more likely when interest groups and subnational governments share common goals.

GovernanceVol. 38(2)
University of Stuttgart (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.