Data formats in analytical DBMSs: performance trade-offs and future directions

Abstract This paper evaluates the suitability of Apache Arrow, Parquet, and ORC as formats for subsumption in an analytical DBMS. We systematically identify and explore the high-level features that are important to support efficient querying in modern OLAP DBMSs and evaluate the ability of each format to support these features. We find that each format has trade-offs that make it more or less suitable for use as a format in a DBMS and identify opportunities to more holistically co-design a unified in-memory and on-disk data representation. Notably, for certain popular machine learning tasks, none of these formats perform optimally, highlighting significant opportunities for advancing format design. Our hope is that this study can be used as a guide for system developers designing and using these formats, as well as provide the community with directions to pursue for improving these common open formats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The VLDB Journal
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-025-00911-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data formats in analytical DBMSs: performance trade-offs and future directions

Matteo Interlandi, Brandon Haynes, Anna Pavlenko, Chunwei Liu
1 citations
The VLDB Journal
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
1.49
article

Data formats in analytical DBMSs: performance trade-offs and future directions

Matteo Interlandi, Brandon Haynes, Anna Pavlenko, Chunwei Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper evaluates the suitability of Apache Arrow, Parquet, and ORC as formats for subsumption in an analytical DBMS. We systematically identify and explore the high-level features that are important to support efficient querying in modern OLAP DBMSs and evaluate the ability of each format to support these features. We find that each format has trade-offs that make it more or less suitable for use as a format in a DBMS and identify opportunities to more holistically co-design a unified in-memory and on-disk data representation. Notably, for certain popular machine learning tasks, none of these formats perform optimally, highlighting significant opportunities for advancing format design. Our hope is that this study can be used as a guide for system developers designing and using these formats, as well as provide the community with directions to pursue for improving these common open formats.

The VLDB JournalVol. 34(3)
Microsoft (United States) (US)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Data formats in analytical DBMSs: performance trade-offs and future directions — Matteo Interlandi, Brandon Haynes, et al. · The VLDB Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS