The efficiency of corporate <scp>R&amp;D</scp> investments: Information‐sharing and government subsidies

Abstract We compare the impact of broad‐based equity incentives and government R&amp;D subsidies on the efficiency of corporate innovation. Chinese corporations that offer broad‐based incentives for employees and managers demonstrate greater R&amp;D investment efficiency, as evidenced by a higher ratio of innovation outputs to cost allocation. Conversely, firms receiving government R&amp;D subsidies demonstrate lower efficiency. Accounting for endogenous treatments in a multi‐treatment framework, we suggest an information‐sharing environment is critical for efficient capital allocation. Government agencies will likely provide subsidies based on information different from what firm headquarters might have, while broad‐based incentive programs encourage employee coordination, enhancing efficiency and project quality. To signal project quality, firms with broad‐based incentives capitalize a higher proportion of R&amp;D costs than subsidized firms. We also find that combining broad‐based incentives and subsidies might not create synergies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Finance
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.70011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The efficiency of corporate R&D investments: Information‐sharing and government subsidies

Takeshi Yamada, Zhaohua Li
1 citations
International Review of Finance
Innovation Policy and R&D
3.13
article

The efficiency of corporate R&D investments: Information‐sharing and government subsidies

Takeshi Yamada, Zhaohua Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We compare the impact of broad‐based equity incentives and government R&amp;D subsidies on the efficiency of corporate innovation. Chinese corporations that offer broad‐based incentives for employees and managers demonstrate greater R&amp;D investment efficiency, as evidenced by a higher ratio of innovation outputs to cost allocation. Conversely, firms receiving government R&amp;D subsidies demonstrate lower efficiency. Accounting for endogenous treatments in a multi‐treatment framework, we suggest an information‐sharing environment is critical for efficient capital allocation. Government agencies will likely provide subsidies based on information different from what firm headquarters might have, while broad‐based incentive programs encourage employee coordination, enhancing efficiency and project quality. To signal project quality, firms with broad‐based incentives capitalize a higher proportion of R&amp;D costs than subsidized firms. We also find that combining broad‐based incentives and subsidies might not create synergies.

International Review of FinanceVol. 25(1)
Australian National University (AU), Lincoln University (NZ)
Lincoln University
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Innovation Policy and R&D
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The efficiency of corporate <scp>R&amp;D</scp> investments: Information‐sharing and government subsidies — Takeshi Yamada, Zhaohua Li · International Review of Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS