Alexander First Nation Members’ Views of Their Relationships With Community Pharmacists: A Qualitative Study Protocol

Background: Indigenous Peoples face inequities in health and social determinants of health due to colonization. Pharmacists must create relationships with Indigenous Peoples because the patient care process depends on it and because relationality is essential to Indigenous Peoples. Pharmacists are well-positioned to provide care due to their accessibility and medication knowledge. Despite the need for a focus on decreasing health inequities, little research within pharmacy in Canada has focused on Indigenous perspectives. This research explores Alexander First Nation (AFN) members’ views of their relationships with community pharmacists in Alberta, Canada, regarding trust, expectations of pharmacists, and willingness to discuss traditional medicines. Methods: General principles of Indigenous research and Ethical Space informed the study design. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) was used, and the research was collaboratively designed with the Alexander Research Committee (ARC). Conversation methodology incorporates a long history of oral tradition with the Indigenous research principles of respect, relevance, and reciprocity. Inclusion criteria were AFN members living in Alexander or outside Alexander who had interacted with a pharmacist as an adult. Qualitative data were collected through one-on-one semi-structured interviews as conversations. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Rigor was ensured by hiring an AFN research assistant, member checking, thematic saturation, an audit trail, and reflexivity. Discussion: An equitable partnership with the ARC was developed using CBPR, which supported Indigenous ways of knowing and doing to be incorporated into the research design and data interpretation. Consequently, the study results will provide information about building relationships with pharmacists that can be delivered back to AFN in a way that respects local First Nation perspectives and is meaningful to community members. Our results will also enable us to provide pharmacists with information about creating mutually beneficial relationships, from a First Nation perspective, necessary for positive Indigenous health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251324960
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alexander First Nation Members’ Views of Their Relationships With Community Pharmacists: A Qualitative Study Protocol

C Allyson Jones, J. Gavin Paul, Mark Makowsky, Cheryl A Sadowski et al.
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Alexander First Nation Members’ Views of Their Relationships With Community Pharmacists: A Qualitative Study Protocol

C Allyson Jones, J. Gavin Paul, Mark Makowsky, Cheryl A Sadowski, Alan R Ruben
article en

Abstract

Background: Indigenous Peoples face inequities in health and social determinants of health due to colonization. Pharmacists must create relationships with Indigenous Peoples because the patient care process depends on it and because relationality is essential to Indigenous Peoples. Pharmacists are well-positioned to provide care due to their accessibility and medication knowledge. Despite the need for a focus on decreasing health inequities, little research within pharmacy in Canada has focused on Indigenous perspectives. This research explores Alexander First Nation (AFN) members’ views of their relationships with community pharmacists in Alberta, Canada, regarding trust, expectations of pharmacists, and willingness to discuss traditional medicines. Methods: General principles of Indigenous research and Ethical Space informed the study design. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) was used, and the research was collaboratively designed with the Alexander Research Committee (ARC). Conversation methodology incorporates a long history of oral tradition with the Indigenous research principles of respect, relevance, and reciprocity. Inclusion criteria were AFN members living in Alexander or outside Alexander who had interacted with a pharmacist as an adult. Qualitative data were collected through one-on-one semi-structured interviews as conversations. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Rigor was ensured by hiring an AFN research assistant, member checking, thematic saturation, an audit trail, and reflexivity. Discussion: An equitable partnership with the ARC was developed using CBPR, which supported Indigenous ways of knowing and doing to be incorporated into the research design and data interpretation. Consequently, the study results will provide information about building relationships with pharmacists that can be delivered back to AFN in a way that respects local First Nation perspectives and is meaningful to community members. Our results will also enable us to provide pharmacists with information about creating mutually beneficial relationships, from a First Nation perspective, necessary for positive Indigenous health outcomes.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 24
University of Alberta (CA), Assembly of First Nations (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.