Predictors of Diagnostic Inaccuracy of Detecting Coronary Artery Stenosis by Preprocedural CT Angiography in Patients Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

<b>Background:</b> The diagnostic performance of preprocedural CT angiography in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been reported. However, data on predictors of diagnostic inaccuracy are sparse. We sought to investigate clinical characteristics and imaging criteria that predict the inaccurate assessment of coronary artery stenosis based on pre-TAVI-CT. <b>Methods:</b> The patient- and vessel-level analysis of all CT datasets from 192 patients (mean age 82.1 ± 4.8 years; 63.5% female) without known CAD or severe renal dysfunction was performed retrospectively in a blinded fashion. Significant CAD was defined as a CAD-RADS™ 2.0 category ≥ 4 by CT. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) served as the reference standard for relevant CAD (≥70% luminal diameter stenosis or fractional flow reserve ≤ 0.80). Pertinent clinical characteristics and imaging criteria of all true-positive (<i>n</i> = 71), false-positive (<i>n</i> = 30), false-negative (<i>n</i> = 4), and true-negative patient-level CT diagnoses (<i>n</i> = 87) for relevant stenosis according to ICA were assessed. <b>Results:</b> In the univariate per-patient analysis, the following parameters yielded discriminative power (<i>p</i> < 0.10) regarding inaccurate CAD assessment by pre-TAVI-CT: age, atrial fibrillation, scanner generation, and image quality. Factors independently associated with CT diagnostic inaccuracy were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis: a younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80 to 0.94; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and insufficient CT image quality (OR 0.6; CI 0.41 to 0.89; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our results demonstrate younger age and poor CT image quality to predict less accurate CAD assessments by pre-TAVI-CT in comparison with ICA. Knowledge of these predictors may aid in more efficient coronary artery interpretations based on pre-TAVI-CT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060771
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of Diagnostic Inaccuracy of Detecting Coronary Artery Stenosis by Preprocedural CT Angiography in Patients Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Andreas Rolf, Won‐Keun Kim, Samuel Tobias Sossalla, Matthias Renker et al.
Diagnostics
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Predictors of Diagnostic Inaccuracy of Detecting Coronary Artery Stenosis by Preprocedural CT Angiography in Patients Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Andreas Rolf, Won‐Keun Kim, Samuel Tobias Sossalla, Matthias Renker, Tim Seidler, Stefan Baumann, Grigorios Korosoglou, Efstratios I. Charitos, Yeong‐Hoon Choi, Steffen D. Kriechbaum, Christian Tesche, Birgid Gonska
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The diagnostic performance of preprocedural CT angiography in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been reported. However, data on predictors of diagnostic inaccuracy are sparse. We sought to investigate clinical characteristics and imaging criteria that predict the inaccurate assessment of coronary artery stenosis based on pre-TAVI-CT. <b>Methods:</b> The patient- and vessel-level analysis of all CT datasets from 192 patients (mean age 82.1 ± 4.8 years; 63.5% female) without known CAD or severe renal dysfunction was performed retrospectively in a blinded fashion. Significant CAD was defined as a CAD-RADS™ 2.0 category ≥ 4 by CT. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) served as the reference standard for relevant CAD (≥70% luminal diameter stenosis or fractional flow reserve ≤ 0.80). Pertinent clinical characteristics and imaging criteria of all true-positive (<i>n</i> = 71), false-positive (<i>n</i> = 30), false-negative (<i>n</i> = 4), and true-negative patient-level CT diagnoses (<i>n</i> = 87) for relevant stenosis according to ICA were assessed. <b>Results:</b> In the univariate per-patient analysis, the following parameters yielded discriminative power (<i>p</i> < 0.10) regarding inaccurate CAD assessment by pre-TAVI-CT: age, atrial fibrillation, scanner generation, and image quality. Factors independently associated with CT diagnostic inaccuracy were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis: a younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80 to 0.94; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and insufficient CT image quality (OR 0.6; CI 0.41 to 0.89; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our results demonstrate younger age and poor CT image quality to predict less accurate CAD assessments by pre-TAVI-CT in comparison with ICA. Knowledge of these predictors may aid in more efficient coronary artery interpretations based on pre-TAVI-CT.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(6)
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Krankenhaus der Augustinerinnen (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Kerckhoff Klinik (DE), University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.