A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Automatic Parkinson’s Disease Detection from Electroencephalogram Signals

<b>Background:</b> Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most prevalent, widespread, and intricate neurodegenerative disorders. According to the experts, at least 1% of people over the age of 60 are affected worldwide. In the present time, the early detection of PD remains difficult due to the absence of a clear consensus on its brain characterization. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a more reliable and efficient technique for early detection of PD. Using the potential of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, this study introduces an innovative method for the detection or classification of PD patients through machine learning, as well as a more accurate deep learning approach. <b>Methods:</b> We propose an innovative EEG-based PD detection approach by integrating advanced spectral feature engineering with machine learning and deep learning models. Using (a) the UC San Diego Resting State EEG dataset and (b) IOWA dataset, we extract a standardized EEG feature from five key frequency bands-alpha, beta, theta, gamma, delta (α,β,θ,γ,δ) and employ an SVM (Support Vector Machine) classifier as a baseline, achieving a notable accuracy. Furthermore, we implement a deep learning classifier (CNN) with a complex multi-dimensional feature set by combining power values from all frequency bands, which gives superior performance in distinguishing PD patients (both with medication and without medication states) from healthy patients. <b>Results:</b> With the five-fold cross-validation on these two datasets, our approaches successfully achieve promising results in a subject dependent scenario. The SVM classifier achieves competitive accuracies of 82% and 94% in the UC San Diego Resting State EEG dataset (using gamma band) and IOWA dataset, respectively in distinguishing PD patients from non-PD patients in subject. With the CNN classifier, our model is able to capture major cross-frequency dependencies of EEG; therefore, the classification accuracies reach beyond 96% and 99% with those two datasets, respectively. We also perform our experiments in a subject independent environment, where the SVM generates 68.09% accuracy. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings, coupled with advanced feature extraction and deep learning, have the potential to provide a non-invasive, efficient, and reliable approach for diagnosing PD, with further work aimed at enhancing feature sets, inclusion of a large number of subjects, and improving model generalizability across more diverse environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060773
Citations
5
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Automatic Parkinson’s Disease Detection from Electroencephalogram Signals

Zong Woo Geem, Young Im Cho, Pawan Kumar Singh, Swagota Bera
5 citations
Diagnostics
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
7.16
article

A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Automatic Parkinson’s Disease Detection from Electroencephalogram Signals

Zong Woo Geem, Young Im Cho, Pawan Kumar Singh, Swagota Bera
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most prevalent, widespread, and intricate neurodegenerative disorders. According to the experts, at least 1% of people over the age of 60 are affected worldwide. In the present time, the early detection of PD remains difficult due to the absence of a clear consensus on its brain characterization. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a more reliable and efficient technique for early detection of PD. Using the potential of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, this study introduces an innovative method for the detection or classification of PD patients through machine learning, as well as a more accurate deep learning approach. <b>Methods:</b> We propose an innovative EEG-based PD detection approach by integrating advanced spectral feature engineering with machine learning and deep learning models. Using (a) the UC San Diego Resting State EEG dataset and (b) IOWA dataset, we extract a standardized EEG feature from five key frequency bands-alpha, beta, theta, gamma, delta (α,β,θ,γ,δ) and employ an SVM (Support Vector Machine) classifier as a baseline, achieving a notable accuracy. Furthermore, we implement a deep learning classifier (CNN) with a complex multi-dimensional feature set by combining power values from all frequency bands, which gives superior performance in distinguishing PD patients (both with medication and without medication states) from healthy patients. <b>Results:</b> With the five-fold cross-validation on these two datasets, our approaches successfully achieve promising results in a subject dependent scenario. The SVM classifier achieves competitive accuracies of 82% and 94% in the UC San Diego Resting State EEG dataset (using gamma band) and IOWA dataset, respectively in distinguishing PD patients from non-PD patients in subject. With the CNN classifier, our model is able to capture major cross-frequency dependencies of EEG; therefore, the classification accuracies reach beyond 96% and 99% with those two datasets, respectively. We also perform our experiments in a subject independent environment, where the SVM generates 68.09% accuracy. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings, coupled with advanced feature extraction and deep learning, have the potential to provide a non-invasive, efficient, and reliable approach for diagnosing PD, with further work aimed at enhancing feature sets, inclusion of a large number of subjects, and improving model generalizability across more diverse environments.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(6)
Gachon University (KR), Jadavpur University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
7.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.