Classification of Heart Failure Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study

Several machine learning classification algorithms were evaluated using a dataset focused on heart failure. Results obtained from logistic regression, random forest, decision tree, K-nearest neighbors, and multilayer perceptron (MLP) were compared to obtain the best model. The random forest method obtained specificity = 0.93, AUC = 0.97, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) = 0.83. The accuracy was high; therefore, it was considered the best model. On the other hand, K-nearest neighbors and MLP (multi-layer perceptron) showed lower accuracy rates. These results confirm the effectiveness of the random forest method in identifying heart failure cases. This study underlines that the number of features, feature selection and quality, model type, and hyperparameter fit are also critical in these studies, as well as the importance of using machine learning techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life15030496
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and ELM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification of Heart Failure Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study

Fernando Villalba-Meneses, Patricia Acosta-Vargas, Paulo Navas, Paulina Vizcaíno-Imacaña et al.
6 citations
Life
Machine Learning and ELM
14.89
article

Classification of Heart Failure Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study

Fernando Villalba-Meneses, Patricia Acosta-Vargas, Paulo Navas, Paulina Vizcaíno-Imacaña, César Guevara, Andrés Tirado-Espín, Carolina Cadena-Morejón, Diego Almeida-Galárraga, Denisse Enríquez-Ortega, Bryan Chulde-Fernández
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Several machine learning classification algorithms were evaluated using a dataset focused on heart failure. Results obtained from logistic regression, random forest, decision tree, K-nearest neighbors, and multilayer perceptron (MLP) were compared to obtain the best model. The random forest method obtained specificity = 0.93, AUC = 0.97, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) = 0.83. The accuracy was high; therefore, it was considered the best model. On the other hand, K-nearest neighbors and MLP (multi-layer perceptron) showed lower accuracy rates. These results confirm the effectiveness of the random forest method in identifying heart failure cases. This study underlines that the number of features, feature selection and quality, model type, and hyperparameter fit are also critical in these studies, as well as the importance of using machine learning techniques.

LifeVol. 15(3)
Universidad Yachay Tech (EC), Universidad de Las Américas (EC), Universidad Internacional del Ecuador (EC)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Machine Learning and ELM
14.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Classification of Heart Failure Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study — Fernando Villalba-Meneses, Patricia Acosta-Vargas, et al. · Life (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS