Current orthognathic surgery practices: A comprehensive survey from planning to discharge in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Detailed information on orthognathic surgery (OGS) practices in Germany, including treatment modalities, surgical concepts, and perioperative care standards, is limited. This study analyzed current practices along the patient pathway, from preoperative planning to discharge, through a nationwide survey of the German Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery using dynamic online questionnaires (up to 56 questions). Responses from 169 surgeons (response-rate 9.2%) revealed substantial variability in training, perioperative care, and digital workflow adoption. While 44.4% used a hybrid of digital and conventional planning methods, broader digital integration was limited by high costs and logistical challenges. Perioperative care varied, particularly in support concepts, blood management, and antibiotic prophylaxis duration, with shorter regimens (≤24h) more common at university-hospitals and private practices. However, 98% agreed on the use of prophylaxis. Surgical approaches were more standardized, with most respondents favoring pre-surgical orthodontics, third molar extraction before OGS, and the maxilla-first approach. Postoperatively, 76% transferred patients to standard care, with 3-5 days discharge times. Significant correlations were observed between surgeon experience, case volume, and improved outcomes, including reduced operative time and faster discharge. These findings underscore the need for standardized OGS protocols to enhance patient safety, optimize recovery, and ensure consistent practices across healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.03.004
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current orthognathic surgery practices: A comprehensive survey from planning to discharge in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Philipp Becker, Daniel G. E. Thiem, Andreas Pabst, Marco Rainer Kesting et al.
3 citations
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Surgical Simulation and Training
6.02
article

Current orthognathic surgery practices: A comprehensive survey from planning to discharge in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Philipp Becker, Daniel G. E. Thiem, Andreas Pabst, Marco Rainer Kesting, Richard Werkmeister, Anne-Kathrin Bär, Bilal Al‐Nawas, Max Heiland, Frederic Bouffleur
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Detailed information on orthognathic surgery (OGS) practices in Germany, including treatment modalities, surgical concepts, and perioperative care standards, is limited. This study analyzed current practices along the patient pathway, from preoperative planning to discharge, through a nationwide survey of the German Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery using dynamic online questionnaires (up to 56 questions). Responses from 169 surgeons (response-rate 9.2%) revealed substantial variability in training, perioperative care, and digital workflow adoption. While 44.4% used a hybrid of digital and conventional planning methods, broader digital integration was limited by high costs and logistical challenges. Perioperative care varied, particularly in support concepts, blood management, and antibiotic prophylaxis duration, with shorter regimens (≤24h) more common at university-hospitals and private practices. However, 98% agreed on the use of prophylaxis. Surgical approaches were more standardized, with most respondents favoring pre-surgical orthodontics, third molar extraction before OGS, and the maxilla-first approach. Postoperatively, 76% transferred patients to standard care, with 3-5 days discharge times. Significant correlations were observed between surgeon experience, case volume, and improved outcomes, including reduced operative time and faster discharge. These findings underscore the need for standardized OGS protocols to enhance patient safety, optimize recovery, and ensure consistent practices across healthcare settings.

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 53(7)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Surgical Simulation and Training
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.