Eddy‐Driven Cross‐Shelf Exchange and Variability in the East Auckland Current

Abstract Using an ocean reanalysis and freely evolving numerical simulation, eddy‐driven cross‐shelf exchange in the East Auckland Current (EAuC) system was investigated. The EAuC is stronger in the reanalysis than the free run and has a more evident impact on cross‐shelf exchange. Despite differences in the EAuC strength, both simulations produced similar small‐eddy (radius 30 km) statistics, which supports the robustness of the reanalysis considering that data assimilation could generate unrealistic variability. These 1‐year simulations revealed mechanisms by which the EAuC and its eddy variability drive water exchange between the continental shelf and the slope that depend on its proximity to the shelfbreak. At times and locations where the EAuC is attached to the continental slope, onshore bottom Ekman transport with variability between 4 and 60 days results in cross‐isobath exchange. However, EAuC‐driven bottom Ekman transport is smaller than the total volume that crosses the shelfbreak (1%–12%), which is largely controlled by submesoscale variability. An eddy‐tracking algorithm was used to identify, classify, and analyze eddy‐driven impact on cross‐shelf exchange in both runs. Cyclonic eddies generated cross‐shelf exchange by exporting up to 291 of shelf waters to the open ocean. Coastal cyclones are small eddies (radius 18 km) formed on the continental shelf via shear instability and have submesoscale characteristics (Rossby and Richardson numbers O (1)) and are more efficient in generating cross‐shelf exchange than larger eddies. Slope cyclones form in deeper waters (200 m) and have transitional characteristics between submesoscale and the large mesoscale eddies (radius 50 km). These larger mesoscale eddies did not have an impact on cross‐shelf exchange. Coastal (slope) eddies pull water from the slope toward the continental shelf with vertical speeds of 30 m/day (15 m/day) and generate temperature anomalies of −1.5°C (−1°C), which follow the eddies' trajectory along their pathway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jc021601
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eddy‐Driven Cross‐Shelf Exchange and Variability in the East Auckland Current

Helen Macdonald, Rafael Santana, Joanne O’Callaghan, Sutara H. Suanda et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
1.79
article

Eddy‐Driven Cross‐Shelf Exchange and Variability in the East Auckland Current

Helen Macdonald, Rafael Santana, Joanne O’Callaghan, Sutara H. Suanda, Sarah Wakes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Using an ocean reanalysis and freely evolving numerical simulation, eddy‐driven cross‐shelf exchange in the East Auckland Current (EAuC) system was investigated. The EAuC is stronger in the reanalysis than the free run and has a more evident impact on cross‐shelf exchange. Despite differences in the EAuC strength, both simulations produced similar small‐eddy (radius 30 km) statistics, which supports the robustness of the reanalysis considering that data assimilation could generate unrealistic variability. These 1‐year simulations revealed mechanisms by which the EAuC and its eddy variability drive water exchange between the continental shelf and the slope that depend on its proximity to the shelfbreak. At times and locations where the EAuC is attached to the continental slope, onshore bottom Ekman transport with variability between 4 and 60 days results in cross‐isobath exchange. However, EAuC‐driven bottom Ekman transport is smaller than the total volume that crosses the shelfbreak (1%–12%), which is largely controlled by submesoscale variability. An eddy‐tracking algorithm was used to identify, classify, and analyze eddy‐driven impact on cross‐shelf exchange in both runs. Cyclonic eddies generated cross‐shelf exchange by exporting up to 291 of shelf waters to the open ocean. Coastal cyclones are small eddies (radius 18 km) formed on the continental shelf via shear instability and have submesoscale characteristics (Rossby and Richardson numbers O (1)) and are more efficient in generating cross‐shelf exchange than larger eddies. Slope cyclones form in deeper waters (200 m) and have transitional characteristics between submesoscale and the large mesoscale eddies (radius 50 km). These larger mesoscale eddies did not have an impact on cross‐shelf exchange. Coastal (slope) eddies pull water from the slope toward the continental shelf with vertical speeds of 30 m/day (15 m/day) and generate temperature anomalies of −1.5°C (−1°C), which follow the eddies' trajectory along their pathway.

Journal of Geophysical Research OceansVol. 130(3)
University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), University of Auckland (NZ), National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.