Guidelines for Evaluating the Antioxidant Activity of Lignin via the 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Assay

The most widespread procedure to measure the antioxidant activity of lignin is via the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay. So far, different experimental procedures (i. e., different solvent, time, etc.) have been used to implement the DPPH methodology without estimating the effect of such modifications on the experimental procedure. To overcome this issue, the impact of the solvent, the time, and the type of substrate on the evaluation of the antioxidant activity (AoA) of lignin via the DPPH assay was investigated in this work. We found that multiple different parameters affect the evaluation of the AoA of lignin: i) the stability of the DPPH radical and the lignin solubility in a given solvent; ii) the importance of reaching steady state (the effect of time); iii) the background noise associated with lignin absorbance at λ=515 nm (used to monitor the DPPH radical scavenging); iv) lignin structure; v) providing a normalized radical scavenging index (nRSI); vi) comparing nRSI vs. inhibition percentage (IP) values. Overall, our investigation allowed us to provide guidelines on how to perform the DPPH assay for a more reliable evaluation of lignin AoA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemSusChem
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202402383
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Free Radicals and Antioxidants
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines for Evaluating the Antioxidant Activity of Lignin via the 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Assay

Mikhail Balakshin, Oliver Musl, Davide Rigo
9 citations
ChemSusChem
Free Radicals and Antioxidants
8.42
article

Guidelines for Evaluating the Antioxidant Activity of Lignin via the 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Assay

Mikhail Balakshin, Oliver Musl, Davide Rigo
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The most widespread procedure to measure the antioxidant activity of lignin is via the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay. So far, different experimental procedures (i. e., different solvent, time, etc.) have been used to implement the DPPH methodology without estimating the effect of such modifications on the experimental procedure. To overcome this issue, the impact of the solvent, the time, and the type of substrate on the evaluation of the antioxidant activity (AoA) of lignin via the DPPH assay was investigated in this work. We found that multiple different parameters affect the evaluation of the AoA of lignin: i) the stability of the DPPH radical and the lignin solubility in a given solvent; ii) the importance of reaching steady state (the effect of time); iii) the background noise associated with lignin absorbance at λ=515 nm (used to monitor the DPPH radical scavenging); iv) lignin structure; v) providing a normalized radical scavenging index (nRSI); vi) comparing nRSI vs. inhibition percentage (IP) values. Overall, our investigation allowed us to provide guidelines on how to perform the DPPH assay for a more reliable evaluation of lignin AoA.

ChemSusChemVol. 18(10)
BOKU University (AT), Aalto University (FI)
Academy of Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Free Radicals and Antioxidants
8.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.