2024 HES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: WAS HUME A MERCANTILIST? FOR SMITH, YES: THE FRIENDLY DISAGREEMENT OF ADAM SMITH AND DAVID HUME ON MONEY

David Hume and Adam Smith were friends, but their friendship does not imply that the two authors shared the same ideas, or should have shared the same ideas. Money is an example of a subject of disagreement between David Hume and Adam Smith that has either been ignored or interpreted as a puzzle, given their friendship. I suggest that Smith did not replicate or cite Hume’s exposition of the quantity of money in his Wealth of Nations because Smith thought Hume was wrong. For Smith, Hume fell into the mercantilist fallacy of considering the accumulation of money as wealth. Rather than accumulating money through market restrictions, as other mercantilists would, Hume advocated the accumulation of money through commerce and hoarding, but Hume’s goal was still the accumulation of gold and silver. Smith saw through Hume’s mistakes and addressed each of them, thus rejecting Hume’s theory of money, while maintaining their friendship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1053837224000518
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2024 HES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: WAS HUME A MERCANTILIST? FOR SMITH, YES: THE FRIENDLY DISAGREEMENT OF ADAM SMITH AND DAVID HUME ON MONEY

Maria Pia Paganelli
2 citations
Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Political Economy and Marxism
8.40
article

2024 HES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: WAS HUME A MERCANTILIST? FOR SMITH, YES: THE FRIENDLY DISAGREEMENT OF ADAM SMITH AND DAVID HUME ON MONEY

Maria Pia Paganelli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

David Hume and Adam Smith were friends, but their friendship does not imply that the two authors shared the same ideas, or should have shared the same ideas. Money is an example of a subject of disagreement between David Hume and Adam Smith that has either been ignored or interpreted as a puzzle, given their friendship. I suggest that Smith did not replicate or cite Hume’s exposition of the quantity of money in his Wealth of Nations because Smith thought Hume was wrong. For Smith, Hume fell into the mercantilist fallacy of considering the accumulation of money as wealth. Rather than accumulating money through market restrictions, as other mercantilists would, Hume advocated the accumulation of money through commerce and hoarding, but Hume’s goal was still the accumulation of gold and silver. Smith saw through Hume’s mistakes and addressed each of them, thus rejecting Hume’s theory of money, while maintaining their friendship.

Journal of the History of Economic ThoughtVol. 47(1)
Trinity University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Political Economy and Marxism
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.