EXTRATERRITORIAL (AUTOMATED) JURISDICTION AND WEB-CONFERENCES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: GROWTH POINT AND INTERCEPTS

The article substantiates the need to implement extraterritorial (automated) jurisdiction into the Russian civil procedure as a means of improving the quality of justice and optimizing the caseload. While monitoring possible and reasonable cases of holding a court hearing in cases of summary proceedings, the author analyzes the question of whether the implementation of this technological innovation will lead to a restriction of the access to justice. The author states the conclusion that the complication that has taken place makes it reasonable to implement an online mode of the court hearing for summary proceedings. The author notes the necessity to overcome technological barriers that make it difficult to implement this proposal. In conclusion, the author defines the further possible stage of justice digitalization.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Хозяйство и право.
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/0134-2398-2024-11-42-54
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXTRATERRITORIAL (AUTOMATED) JURISDICTION AND WEB-CONFERENCES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: GROWTH POINT AND INTERCEPTS

Dmitry A. Guziy
Хозяйство и право.
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

EXTRATERRITORIAL (AUTOMATED) JURISDICTION AND WEB-CONFERENCES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: GROWTH POINT AND INTERCEPTS

Dmitry A. Guziy
article en

Abstract

The article substantiates the need to implement extraterritorial (automated) jurisdiction into the Russian civil procedure as a means of improving the quality of justice and optimizing the caseload. While monitoring possible and reasonable cases of holding a court hearing in cases of summary proceedings, the author analyzes the question of whether the implementation of this technological innovation will lead to a restriction of the access to justice. The author states the conclusion that the complication that has taken place makes it reasonable to implement an online mode of the court hearing for summary proceedings. The author notes the necessity to overcome technological barriers that make it difficult to implement this proposal. In conclusion, the author defines the further possible stage of justice digitalization.

Хозяйство и право.
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.