Paradoxical Tensions Across Multiple Levels and Top Management Team Cross-Level Bridging in Coopetition: A Conceptual Model

In contrast to the conventional strategic management research, which emphasizes either cooperation or competition as a beneficial strategy, emerging literature on coopetition has advanced our understanding of how pursuing both cooperation and competition can yield greater benefits. However, the literature offers limited insights into the multi-level dynamics of coopetition and the role of top management teams (TMT) in navigating paradoxical tensions that cascade across levels — tensions that, if not tackled well, can overturn the benefits associated with coopetition. Drawing on the paradox literature, this paper develops a conceptual model to illustrate how the coopetition paradox unfolds across different levels, activating performing, organizing, and belonging tensions, that, in turn, shape the interplay between cooperation and competition at the inter-firm level. A key contribution of this paper is its focus on the central role of TMTs in managing multiple tensions across levels, particularly through the synchronous orchestration of internal processes at the firm level while constantly navigating coopetitive interactions at the inter-firm level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Management Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/111.00000076
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Business Strategy and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paradoxical Tensions Across Multiple Levels and Top Management Team Cross-Level Bridging in Coopetition: A Conceptual Model

Tatbeeq Raza‐Ullah, Maria Bengtsson
4 citations
Strategic Management Review
Business Strategy and Innovation
8.91
article

Paradoxical Tensions Across Multiple Levels and Top Management Team Cross-Level Bridging in Coopetition: A Conceptual Model

Tatbeeq Raza‐Ullah, Maria Bengtsson
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In contrast to the conventional strategic management research, which emphasizes either cooperation or competition as a beneficial strategy, emerging literature on coopetition has advanced our understanding of how pursuing both cooperation and competition can yield greater benefits. However, the literature offers limited insights into the multi-level dynamics of coopetition and the role of top management teams (TMT) in navigating paradoxical tensions that cascade across levels — tensions that, if not tackled well, can overturn the benefits associated with coopetition. Drawing on the paradox literature, this paper develops a conceptual model to illustrate how the coopetition paradox unfolds across different levels, activating performing, organizing, and belonging tensions, that, in turn, shape the interplay between cooperation and competition at the inter-firm level. A key contribution of this paper is its focus on the central role of TMTs in managing multiple tensions across levels, particularly through the synchronous orchestration of internal processes at the firm level while constantly navigating coopetitive interactions at the inter-firm level.

Strategic Management ReviewVol. 6(1-2)
Nottingham Trent University (GB), Umeå University (SE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Business Strategy and Innovation
8.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Paradoxical Tensions Across Multiple Levels and Top Management Team Cross-Level Bridging in Coopetition: A Conceptual Model — Tatbeeq Raza‐Ullah, Maria Bengtsson · Strategic Management Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS