What Coopetition Is and What It Is Not: Defining the "Hard Core" and the "Protective Belt" of Coopetition

While a growing number of contributions rely on the concept of coopetition, they adopt very different, and sometimes contradictory, perspectives. Our article aims to lay a foundation for future research on coopetition by defining what can and cannot be categorized as coopetition. Building on a Lakatosian approach, we identify three assumptions that compose the "hard core" of coopetition as a research program. We argue that coopetition requires (1) simultaneous competition and cooperation; (2) an intense competition between partnering firms in critical markets, and (3) an intense cooperation between competing firms in critical activities or markets. In addition to the hard core, the Lakatosian approach enables us to highlight eight key debates that compose the "protective belt" of coopetition and that are represented as many research avenues. As coopetition becomes a trending research topic, defining its nature to lay its foundation is now more important than ever. This research thus contributes to a clear definition of what coopetition is and what it is not.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Management Review
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/111.00000073
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Business Strategy and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Coopetition Is and What It Is Not: Defining the "Hard Core" and the "Protective Belt" of Coopetition

Anne‐Sophie Fernandez, Paul Chiambaretto, Frédéric Le Roy
6 citations
Strategic Management Review
Business Strategy and Innovation
4.45
article

What Coopetition Is and What It Is Not: Defining the "Hard Core" and the "Protective Belt" of Coopetition

Anne‐Sophie Fernandez, Paul Chiambaretto, Frédéric Le Roy
article en
6 citations

Abstract

While a growing number of contributions rely on the concept of coopetition, they adopt very different, and sometimes contradictory, perspectives. Our article aims to lay a foundation for future research on coopetition by defining what can and cannot be categorized as coopetition. Building on a Lakatosian approach, we identify three assumptions that compose the "hard core" of coopetition as a research program. We argue that coopetition requires (1) simultaneous competition and cooperation; (2) an intense competition between partnering firms in critical markets, and (3) an intense cooperation between competing firms in critical activities or markets. In addition to the hard core, the Lakatosian approach enables us to highlight eight key debates that compose the "protective belt" of coopetition and that are represented as many research avenues. As coopetition becomes a trending research topic, defining its nature to lay its foundation is now more important than ever. This research thus contributes to a clear definition of what coopetition is and what it is not.

Strategic Management ReviewVol. 6(1)
École Polytechnique (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Montpellier Business School (FR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Business Strategy and Innovation
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Coopetition Is and What It Is Not: Defining the "Hard Core" and the "Protective Belt" of Coopetition — Anne‐Sophie Fernandez, Paul Chiambaretto, et al. · Strategic Management Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS