The Limits of New Historicism: Marjorie Levinson’s Interpretation of “Tintern Abbey”

Within the field of New Historicism studies of British Romantic poetry, Marjorie Levinson’s interpretation of William Wordsworth’s “Tintern Abbey” holds a significant position. However, Levinson’s analysis exhibits a notable flaw: her utilization of Gilpin’s texts without adequately considering the ideological backdrop they carry. This oversight neglects the unique historical context of these materials, specifically the prevalent ideology of the “picturesque” and the related phenomenon of picturesque tourism in late 18th-century Britain. By delving into this omission, this paper aims to unveil the inherent paradoxes within the New Historicist methodology itself and further explores the “post-critique” strategies of New Historicism in literary analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/swbr7531
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Limits of New Historicism: Marjorie Levinson’s Interpretation of “Tintern Abbey”

Jaeseok Yun
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

The Limits of New Historicism: Marjorie Levinson’s Interpretation of “Tintern Abbey”

Jaeseok Yun
article en

Abstract

Within the field of New Historicism studies of British Romantic poetry, Marjorie Levinson’s interpretation of William Wordsworth’s “Tintern Abbey” holds a significant position. However, Levinson’s analysis exhibits a notable flaw: her utilization of Gilpin’s texts without adequately considering the ideological backdrop they carry. This oversight neglects the unique historical context of these materials, specifically the prevalent ideology of the “picturesque” and the related phenomenon of picturesque tourism in late 18th-century Britain. By delving into this omission, this paper aims to unveil the inherent paradoxes within the New Historicist methodology itself and further explores the “post-critique” strategies of New Historicism in literary analysis.

Frontiers in Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 5(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.