Quantifying both socioeconomic and climate uncertainty in coupled human–Earth systems analysis

Information about the likelihood of various outcomes is needed to inform discussions about climate mitigation and adaptation. Here we provide integrated, probabilistic socio-economic and climate projections, using estimates of probability distributions for key parameters in both human and Earth system components of a coupled model. We find that policy lowers the upper tail of temperature change more than the median. We also find that while human system uncertainties dominate uncertainty of radiative forcing, Earth system uncertainties contribute more than twice as much to temperature uncertainty in scenarios without fixed emissions paths, reflecting the uncertainty of translating radiative forcing into temperature. The combination of human and Earth system uncertainty is less than additive, illustrating the value of integrated modeling. Further, we find that policy costs are more uncertain in low- and middle-income economies, and that renewables are robust investments across a wide range of policies and socio-economic uncertainties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57897-1
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying both socioeconomic and climate uncertainty in coupled human–Earth systems analysis

Ronald G. Prinn, Sergey Paltsev, Andrei Sokolov, John Reilly et al.
13 citations
Nature Communications
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
14.37
article

Quantifying both socioeconomic and climate uncertainty in coupled human–Earth systems analysis

Ronald G. Prinn, Sergey Paltsev, Andrei Sokolov, John Reilly, Henry D. Jacoby, Alex Libardoni, C. Adam Schlosser, Jennifer Morris, Chris E. Forest
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Information about the likelihood of various outcomes is needed to inform discussions about climate mitigation and adaptation. Here we provide integrated, probabilistic socio-economic and climate projections, using estimates of probability distributions for key parameters in both human and Earth system components of a coupled model. We find that policy lowers the upper tail of temperature change more than the median. We also find that while human system uncertainties dominate uncertainty of radiative forcing, Earth system uncertainties contribute more than twice as much to temperature uncertainty in scenarios without fixed emissions paths, reflecting the uncertainty of translating radiative forcing into temperature. The combination of human and Earth system uncertainty is less than additive, illustrating the value of integrated modeling. Further, we find that policy costs are more uncertain in low- and middle-income economies, and that renewables are robust investments across a wide range of policies and socio-economic uncertainties.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), IIT@MIT (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Colorado State University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
14.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying both socioeconomic and climate uncertainty in coupled human–Earth systems analysis — Ronald G. Prinn, Sergey Paltsev, et al. · Nature Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS