Maize–common bean intercropping effects on nitrogen fixation, nutrient uptake, and soil properties in southern Ethiopia

Abstract Smallholder farmers need to cope with small farm sizes, low soil fertility, and risks associated with rain‐fed agriculture, which resulted in low productivity. Crop diversification potentially improves yields and resource use efficiencies in these systems. Field experiments were conducted at two sites in southern Ethiopia to determine the effects of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping time and frequency on biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), nutrient uptake, and soil properties. Treatments included monocrops of maize (M) and common bean (Bn), double common bean mono crop (Bn + Bn), simultaneous (M + Bn), relay (M + BnR), and sequential common bean intercropping with maize (M + Bn + Bn). BNF by common bean under these systems was estimated BNF using the 15 N natural abundance method. Intercropping had no significant ( p > 0.05) effect on BNF compared to common bean monoculture at both sites. However, there were significant differences in BNF among intercropping systems at site 1. Significantly higher BNF were obtained from M + Bn + Bn compared with M + Bn and M + BnR. Intercropping significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the N and P uptakes compared to unfertilized maize monoculture at both sites, resulting in increased yields but no significant effect on nutrient use efficiencies. Significantly higher N and P uptakes were obtained from M + Bn + Bn compared to other intercropping, and significantly lower N and P uptakes were obtained from M + Bn and M + BnR. Intercropping had no significant ( p > 0.05) effect on most soil properties possibly due to the short experimental duration. Therefore, nutrient management strategy is required in intercropping systems to counter the increased nutrient uptake which could cause soil depletion in the long term particularly if all biomass is removed from the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70037
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maize–common bean intercropping effects on nitrogen fixation, nutrient uptake, and soil properties in southern Ethiopia

Girma Abera, Frank Rasche, Sheleme Beyene, Tigist Yimer et al.
1 citations
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
1.90
article

Maize–common bean intercropping effects on nitrogen fixation, nutrient uptake, and soil properties in southern Ethiopia

Girma Abera, Frank Rasche, Sheleme Beyene, Tigist Yimer, Shimelis Gizachew
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Smallholder farmers need to cope with small farm sizes, low soil fertility, and risks associated with rain‐fed agriculture, which resulted in low productivity. Crop diversification potentially improves yields and resource use efficiencies in these systems. Field experiments were conducted at two sites in southern Ethiopia to determine the effects of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping time and frequency on biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), nutrient uptake, and soil properties. Treatments included monocrops of maize (M) and common bean (Bn), double common bean mono crop (Bn + Bn), simultaneous (M + Bn), relay (M + BnR), and sequential common bean intercropping with maize (M + Bn + Bn). BNF by common bean under these systems was estimated BNF using the 15 N natural abundance method. Intercropping had no significant ( p > 0.05) effect on BNF compared to common bean monoculture at both sites. However, there were significant differences in BNF among intercropping systems at site 1. Significantly higher BNF were obtained from M + Bn + Bn compared with M + Bn and M + BnR. Intercropping significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the N and P uptakes compared to unfertilized maize monoculture at both sites, resulting in increased yields but no significant effect on nutrient use efficiencies. Significantly higher N and P uptakes were obtained from M + Bn + Bn compared to other intercropping, and significantly lower N and P uptakes were obtained from M + Bn and M + BnR. Intercropping had no significant ( p > 0.05) effect on most soil properties possibly due to the short experimental duration. Therefore, nutrient management strategy is required in intercropping systems to counter the increased nutrient uptake which could cause soil depletion in the long term particularly if all biomass is removed from the field.

Soil Science Society of America JournalVol. 89(2)
University of Hohenheim (DE), Hawassa University (ET)
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.