The Investigating of Self-Regulatory Method to Enhance Students’ Autonomous Learning Ability for Freshmen at Yunnan Normal University

This study focused on freshmen at Yunnan Normal University. The research objectives were threefold: (1) to investigate the role of self-regulatory methods in enhancing students’ autonomous learning ability, (2) to study the differences between the control group and the experimental group, and (3) to determine if students are satisfied with self-regulatory methods for enhancing autonomous learning ability. The research sample included 9,000 new students in the 2023 academic year. There were 48 classrooms, each consisting of 180-187 students. Students from two randomly selected classrooms were studied. The study employed stratified random quantitative analysis. Statistical analysis used mean average value (X̄), standard deviation (S.D.), and variance to interpret the data. The main research tools were questionnaires, lesson plans, and a satisfaction questionnaire. The results showed: (1) The overall mean score was 4.11 with a standard deviation of 0.4, indicating a generally high recognition of autonomous learning methods among the students in the experimental group, reaching the “agree” level; (2) for the experimental group X̄ was 94.57, while the control group had an X̄ of 75.15. The experimental group exhibited less variability in scores, with an S.D. of 2.82 compared to 9.49 for the control group, indicating more consistent and concentrated performance among the experimental group students. Additionally, the variance for the experimental group was 7.98, whereas the variance for the control group was 90.13, demonstrating the stability and reliability of the experimental group’s performance. (3) By comparing the results of the experimental and control groups, it is evident that self-regulatory methods significantly enhance students’ satisfaction with their autonomous learning experiences. The experimental group had higher satisfaction levels, with an X̄ of 4.71, very satisfied, and an S.D. of 0.23, compared to the control group, which had an X̄ of 2.72, dissatisfied, and an S.D. of 0.71. This study’s results indicate that self-regulatory methods significantly enhance students’ autonomous learning ability, with noticeable differences between the experimental and control groups, and that students are satisfied with these methods. Future research could further explore the application of self-regulatory methods across different educational stages and subjects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Education Studies
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v18n2p89
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Investigating of Self-Regulatory Method to Enhance Students’ Autonomous Learning Ability for Freshmen at Yunnan Normal University

Clinton Chidiebere Anyanwu, Nur Fauziyah, Saifon Songsiengchai, Jiaoying Ji
International Education Studies
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

The Investigating of Self-Regulatory Method to Enhance Students’ Autonomous Learning Ability for Freshmen at Yunnan Normal University

Clinton Chidiebere Anyanwu, Nur Fauziyah, Saifon Songsiengchai, Jiaoying Ji
article en

Abstract

This study focused on freshmen at Yunnan Normal University. The research objectives were threefold: (1) to investigate the role of self-regulatory methods in enhancing students’ autonomous learning ability, (2) to study the differences between the control group and the experimental group, and (3) to determine if students are satisfied with self-regulatory methods for enhancing autonomous learning ability. The research sample included 9,000 new students in the 2023 academic year. There were 48 classrooms, each consisting of 180-187 students. Students from two randomly selected classrooms were studied. The study employed stratified random quantitative analysis. Statistical analysis used mean average value (X̄), standard deviation (S.D.), and variance to interpret the data. The main research tools were questionnaires, lesson plans, and a satisfaction questionnaire. The results showed: (1) The overall mean score was 4.11 with a standard deviation of 0.4, indicating a generally high recognition of autonomous learning methods among the students in the experimental group, reaching the “agree” level; (2) for the experimental group X̄ was 94.57, while the control group had an X̄ of 75.15. The experimental group exhibited less variability in scores, with an S.D. of 2.82 compared to 9.49 for the control group, indicating more consistent and concentrated performance among the experimental group students. Additionally, the variance for the experimental group was 7.98, whereas the variance for the control group was 90.13, demonstrating the stability and reliability of the experimental group’s performance. (3) By comparing the results of the experimental and control groups, it is evident that self-regulatory methods significantly enhance students’ satisfaction with their autonomous learning experiences. The experimental group had higher satisfaction levels, with an X̄ of 4.71, very satisfied, and an S.D. of 0.23, compared to the control group, which had an X̄ of 2.72, dissatisfied, and an S.D. of 0.71. This study’s results indicate that self-regulatory methods significantly enhance students’ autonomous learning ability, with noticeable differences between the experimental and control groups, and that students are satisfied with these methods. Future research could further explore the application of self-regulatory methods across different educational stages and subjects.

International Education StudiesVol. 18(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.