A presentation of the torus‐equivariant quantum K‐theory ring of flag manifolds of type A, Part I: The defining ideal

Abstract We give a presentation of the torus‐equivariant (small) quantum ‐theory ring of flag manifolds of type , as the quotient of a polynomial ring by an explicit ideal. This result is the torus‐equivariant version of our previous one, which gives a presentation of the nonequivariant quantum ‐theory ring of flag manifolds of type . However, the method of proof for the torus‐equivariant one is entirely different from that for the nonequivariant one; our proof is based on the result in the limit, and uses Nakayama‐type arguments to upgrade it to the quantum situation. Also, in contrast to the nonequivariant case in which we used the Chevalley formula, we make use of the inverse Chevalley formula for the torus‐equivariant ‐group of semi‐infinite flag manifolds to obtain relations that yield our presentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the London Mathematical Society
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms.70095
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A presentation of the torus‐equivariant quantum K‐theory ring of flag manifolds of type A, Part I: The defining ideal

Daisuke Sagaki, Toshiaki Maeno, Satoshi Naito
1 citations
Journal of the London Mathematical Society
Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
4.09
article

A presentation of the torus‐equivariant quantum K‐theory ring of flag manifolds of type A, Part I: The defining ideal

Daisuke Sagaki, Toshiaki Maeno, Satoshi Naito
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We give a presentation of the torus‐equivariant (small) quantum ‐theory ring of flag manifolds of type , as the quotient of a polynomial ring by an explicit ideal. This result is the torus‐equivariant version of our previous one, which gives a presentation of the nonequivariant quantum ‐theory ring of flag manifolds of type . However, the method of proof for the torus‐equivariant one is entirely different from that for the nonequivariant one; our proof is based on the result in the limit, and uses Nakayama‐type arguments to upgrade it to the quantum situation. Also, in contrast to the nonequivariant case in which we used the Chevalley formula, we make use of the inverse Chevalley formula for the torus‐equivariant ‐group of semi‐infinite flag manifolds to obtain relations that yield our presentation.

Journal of the London Mathematical SocietyVol. 111(3)
University of Tsukuba (JP), Meijo University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
4.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.