Modelling anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste: From lab to full scale

Biogas production through anaerobic digestion offers a promising alternative to address climate change. In this study, the ADM1 model was used to simulate the digestion of four different substrates: a mixture of rye and maize silage, a mixture of cow slurry and maize silage, cow slurry alone, and food waste. Furthermore, the determination of total solids (TS) content was integrated into the model. Based on experimental data from 5 L Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTR), ADM1 model parameters were calibrated for each substrate, primarily differing in hydrolysis and inhibition constants. These parameters, along with two additional sets of parameters from the literature, were subsequently applied in simulations to assess methane productivity, yield, and TS under increasing organic loading rates (OLR) for each substrate. Among the substrates, food waste showed the highest productivity, yield, and solids removal, while rye and maize silage substrate was the most unstable, with system failure at the lowest OLR (7 kgVS.m<sup>-3</sup>.d<sup>-1</sup>) compared to the other substrates. In addition, co-digestion of cow slurry and maize silage showed synergies between maize silage and cow slurry, achieving a productivity of 2.62 Nm<sup>3</sup>.m<sup>-3</sup>.d<sup>-1</sup>. Moreover, the parameters determined for rye and maize silage mixture were further used to simulate a full-scale anaerobic digestion unit fed with rye and maize silage as substrate. A difference in volatile fatty acid accumulation was found between the lab- and full-scale systems, suggesting a possible better microbial adaptation to inhibitory factors in the full-scale system. Further investigation into inhibition effects is recommended to improve the predictive accuracy of the ADM1.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114739
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste: From lab to full scale

Renaud Escudié, Tiago Edson Simkunas Segura, Pier-George Zanoni, Ulysse Brémond et al.
4 citations
Waste Management
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
4.03
article

Modelling anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste: From lab to full scale

Renaud Escudié, Tiago Edson Simkunas Segura, Pier-George Zanoni, Ulysse Brémond, Jean‐Philippe Steyer, Constance Lucet-Bérille, Antoine Pradel
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Biogas production through anaerobic digestion offers a promising alternative to address climate change. In this study, the ADM1 model was used to simulate the digestion of four different substrates: a mixture of rye and maize silage, a mixture of cow slurry and maize silage, cow slurry alone, and food waste. Furthermore, the determination of total solids (TS) content was integrated into the model. Based on experimental data from 5 L Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTR), ADM1 model parameters were calibrated for each substrate, primarily differing in hydrolysis and inhibition constants. These parameters, along with two additional sets of parameters from the literature, were subsequently applied in simulations to assess methane productivity, yield, and TS under increasing organic loading rates (OLR) for each substrate. Among the substrates, food waste showed the highest productivity, yield, and solids removal, while rye and maize silage substrate was the most unstable, with system failure at the lowest OLR (7 kgVS.m<sup>-3</sup>.d<sup>-1</sup>) compared to the other substrates. In addition, co-digestion of cow slurry and maize silage showed synergies between maize silage and cow slurry, achieving a productivity of 2.62 Nm<sup>3</sup>.m<sup>-3</sup>.d<sup>-1</sup>. Moreover, the parameters determined for rye and maize silage mixture were further used to simulate a full-scale anaerobic digestion unit fed with rye and maize silage as substrate. A difference in volatile fatty acid accumulation was found between the lab- and full-scale systems, suggesting a possible better microbial adaptation to inhibitory factors in the full-scale system. Further investigation into inhibition effects is recommended to improve the predictive accuracy of the ADM1.

Waste ManagementVol. 200
Université de Montpellier (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), CentraleSupélec (FR), Laboratoire de Biotechnologie de l'Environnement (FR), Air Liquide (France) (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
4.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.