The Effect of Sepsis Recognition on Telemedicine Use in Rural Emergency Department Sepsis Treatment

<b>Background:</b> Provider-to-provider emergency department telehealth (tele-ED) has been proposed to improve rural sepsis care. The objective of this study was to measure the association between sepsis documentation and tele-ED use, treatment guideline adherence, and mortality. <b>Methods:</b> This analysis was a multicenter (<i>n</i> = 23) cohort study of sepsis patients treated in rural emergency departments (EDs) that participated in a tele-ED network between August 2016 and June 2019. The primary outcome was whether sepsis was documented explicitly in the clinical note impression in the local ED, and the primary exposure was rural tele-ED use, with secondary outcomes of time to tele-ED use, 3-h guideline adherence, and in-hospital mortality. <b>Results:</b> Data from 1,146 rural sepsis patients were included, 315 (27%) had tele-ED used and 415 (36%) had sepsis recognized in the rural ED. Tele-ED use was not independently associated with sepsis recognition (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-1.67). Sepsis recognition was associated with earlier tele-ED activation (adjusted hazard ratio 1.66, 95% CI: 1.28-2.15) and greater 3-h guideline adherence (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.03-1.83) Sepsis recognition was not independently associated with mortality (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 0.97-1.80). <b>Conclusions:</b> Although tele-ED care is a promising strategy to improve sepsis outcomes, its use was limited by under-recognition of sepsis in rural EDs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0281
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Sepsis Recognition on Telemedicine Use in Rural Emergency Department Sepsis Treatment

Luke Mack, Karisa K. Harland, Marcia M. Ward, Anne Zepeski et al.
1 citations
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
1.35
article

The Effect of Sepsis Recognition on Telemedicine Use in Rural Emergency Department Sepsis Treatment

Luke Mack, Karisa K. Harland, Marcia M. Ward, Anne Zepeski, Amanda Bell, Cole Wymore, Kelli Wallace, Kalyn Campbell, J. Priyanka Vakkalanka, Katie DeJong, Brett Faine, Keith J. Mueller, Morgan B. Swanson, Anna M. Kaldjian, Elizabeth A. Chrischilles, Nicholas M. Mohr, Michael Jones, Christopher R. Carpenter, Brian M. Fuller, Uche Okoro, Edith A. Parker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Provider-to-provider emergency department telehealth (tele-ED) has been proposed to improve rural sepsis care. The objective of this study was to measure the association between sepsis documentation and tele-ED use, treatment guideline adherence, and mortality. <b>Methods:</b> This analysis was a multicenter (<i>n</i> = 23) cohort study of sepsis patients treated in rural emergency departments (EDs) that participated in a tele-ED network between August 2016 and June 2019. The primary outcome was whether sepsis was documented explicitly in the clinical note impression in the local ED, and the primary exposure was rural tele-ED use, with secondary outcomes of time to tele-ED use, 3-h guideline adherence, and in-hospital mortality. <b>Results:</b> Data from 1,146 rural sepsis patients were included, 315 (27%) had tele-ED used and 415 (36%) had sepsis recognized in the rural ED. Tele-ED use was not independently associated with sepsis recognition (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-1.67). Sepsis recognition was associated with earlier tele-ED activation (adjusted hazard ratio 1.66, 95% CI: 1.28-2.15) and greater 3-h guideline adherence (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.03-1.83) Sepsis recognition was not independently associated with mortality (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 0.97-1.80). <b>Conclusions:</b> Although tele-ED care is a promising strategy to improve sepsis outcomes, its use was limited by under-recognition of sepsis in rural EDs.

Telemedicine Journal and e-HealthVol. 31(7)
University of Iowa (US), Gundersen Health System (US), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), University of Minnesota (US), Sanford Health (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Sioux Falls (US), Gundersen Lutheran Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.