Prophylactic anticoagulation in traumatic subdural hematoma

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with acute subdural hematoma (SDH) is common in neurosurgical care. Especially due to demographic development, it becomes increasingly coincident with preexisting therapeutic anticoagulation and comorbidity, such as atrial fibrillation or coagulative disorders. High-velocity trauma mechanisms become rarer, while low-impact trauma to the skull with acute-on-chronic subdural hemorrhage gets relatively more frequent. In this study we elucidate the timing of perioperative prophylactic AC and its influence on morbidity and mortality as well as complications after neurosurgical treatment. We focused especially on postoperative intracranial hemorrhage (PH) and thromboembolic events (TE). For this retrospective data analysis, 259 patients who suffered from severe TBI with consecutive subdural hematoma between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2019 were included. We followed up for the length of stay. We assessed various biographical and clinical data for risk factors and focused on the connection between time-point of AC and adverse events. Subgroup analyses were performed for TE and PH that either required surgical intervention or was managed conservatively with radiological follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, Mann-Whitney U Test, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and univariate binomial logistic regression. P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. TE were relatively rare in this cohort (n = 14, 5.4%). The more common adverse event was PH (n = 34, 13.1%), with a total of 28 patients (10.8%) needing surgical revision. Though PH was correlated to a delay in AC (p = 0.010), there was no correlation between early prophylactic AC and PH (p = 0.287) or TE (p = 0.444), respectively. Furthermore, only 4 patients had been administered AC before the PH. In this context, AC was delayed purposely after PH, explaining the significant correlation between PH and delayed AC. Occurrence of PH significantly decreased overall survival (p = 0.022), while TE did not (p = 0.357). Prophylactic AC within 24-48 h after surgery did not result in more frequent PH. Our data on AC timing suggest that PH is not caused by prophylactic AC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93981-8
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prophylactic anticoagulation in traumatic subdural hematoma

Johannes Kasper, Tim Wende, Erdem Güresir, Jürgen Meixensberger et al.
Scientific Reports
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
article

Prophylactic anticoagulation in traumatic subdural hematoma

Johannes Kasper, Tim Wende, Erdem Güresir, Jürgen Meixensberger, Michael Gaier, Florian Wilhelmy, Gordian Prasse, Börge Bastian
article en

Abstract

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with acute subdural hematoma (SDH) is common in neurosurgical care. Especially due to demographic development, it becomes increasingly coincident with preexisting therapeutic anticoagulation and comorbidity, such as atrial fibrillation or coagulative disorders. High-velocity trauma mechanisms become rarer, while low-impact trauma to the skull with acute-on-chronic subdural hemorrhage gets relatively more frequent. In this study we elucidate the timing of perioperative prophylactic AC and its influence on morbidity and mortality as well as complications after neurosurgical treatment. We focused especially on postoperative intracranial hemorrhage (PH) and thromboembolic events (TE). For this retrospective data analysis, 259 patients who suffered from severe TBI with consecutive subdural hematoma between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2019 were included. We followed up for the length of stay. We assessed various biographical and clinical data for risk factors and focused on the connection between time-point of AC and adverse events. Subgroup analyses were performed for TE and PH that either required surgical intervention or was managed conservatively with radiological follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, Mann-Whitney U Test, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and univariate binomial logistic regression. P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. TE were relatively rare in this cohort (n = 14, 5.4%). The more common adverse event was PH (n = 34, 13.1%), with a total of 28 patients (10.8%) needing surgical revision. Though PH was correlated to a delay in AC (p = 0.010), there was no correlation between early prophylactic AC and PH (p = 0.287) or TE (p = 0.444), respectively. Furthermore, only 4 patients had been administered AC before the PH. In this context, AC was delayed purposely after PH, explaining the significant correlation between PH and delayed AC. Occurrence of PH significantly decreased overall survival (p = 0.022), while TE did not (p = 0.357). Prophylactic AC within 24-48 h after surgery did not result in more frequent PH. Our data on AC timing suggest that PH is not caused by prophylactic AC.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.