Quantitative Relative Chemical Assessment to Support Risk Frameworks for Water Recycling

Water resources around the world are increasingly affected by the pressures of population growth and climate change, with substantial risks of water shortages for public supply, agriculture, energy generation, and industry, with impacts on freshwater ecology. Thus, many water utilities are turning to or considering water recycling to augment existing supplies. It is incumbent on a utility to demonstrate that augmenting its water supply with recycled water does not create undue excess risk compared to existing sources that are considered protective of public health. This research quantified the chemical risks associated with using recycled water as a source of water supply. Linear cancer slope factors and threshold dose values were used with chemical concentrations measured at an advanced water recycling pilot in the southern UK to quantify chemical risk profiles of six waters: two existing drinking water source waters, a secondary treated wastewater effluent serving as the influent to the advanced water treatment pilot, and after each treatment step in the pilot (ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultraviolet advanced oxidation). This study builds on previous work by considering risks throughout the advanced water recycling treatment train via Monte Carlo simulation and evaluating several approaches to handling censored data sets; the analysis leveraged data from an extensive sampling campaign including 37 cancer risk chemicals and 289 threshold-based risk chemicals. Overall, conclusions around relative risk were relatively insensitive to the approach used for handling censored data, while using a stochastic method provided improved insights into the variability of risk. Cancer and noncancer risk profiles of water treated through the advanced treatment train were comparable or better than existing water supply works source waters. This finding provides strong evidence that use of highly treated recycled water as a source of supply is protective of public health from chemical risks when compared to existing source water supplies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c01140
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Relative Chemical Assessment to Support Risk Frameworks for Water Recycling

Riley Mulhern, Christopher H. Jones, Varsha Wylie, Katherine Y. Bell et al.
1 citations
ACS ES&T Water
Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
1.20
article

Quantitative Relative Chemical Assessment to Support Risk Frameworks for Water Recycling

Riley Mulhern, Christopher H. Jones, Varsha Wylie, Katherine Y. Bell, Shubhashini Oza, Melanie Holmer, John Fawell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Water resources around the world are increasingly affected by the pressures of population growth and climate change, with substantial risks of water shortages for public supply, agriculture, energy generation, and industry, with impacts on freshwater ecology. Thus, many water utilities are turning to or considering water recycling to augment existing supplies. It is incumbent on a utility to demonstrate that augmenting its water supply with recycled water does not create undue excess risk compared to existing sources that are considered protective of public health. This research quantified the chemical risks associated with using recycled water as a source of water supply. Linear cancer slope factors and threshold dose values were used with chemical concentrations measured at an advanced water recycling pilot in the southern UK to quantify chemical risk profiles of six waters: two existing drinking water source waters, a secondary treated wastewater effluent serving as the influent to the advanced water treatment pilot, and after each treatment step in the pilot (ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultraviolet advanced oxidation). This study builds on previous work by considering risks throughout the advanced water recycling treatment train via Monte Carlo simulation and evaluating several approaches to handling censored data sets; the analysis leveraged data from an extensive sampling campaign including 37 cancer risk chemicals and 289 threshold-based risk chemicals. Overall, conclusions around relative risk were relatively insensitive to the approach used for handling censored data, while using a stochastic method provided improved insights into the variability of risk. Cancer and noncancer risk profiles of water treated through the advanced treatment train were comparable or better than existing water supply works source waters. This finding provides strong evidence that use of highly treated recycled water as a source of supply is protective of public health from chemical risks when compared to existing source water supplies.

ACS ES&T WaterVol. 5(4)
Southern Water (United Kingdom) (GB), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (FR), Brown and Caldwell (United States) (US), Jacobs (United States) (US), Cranfield University (GB)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.