Analysis of Whistleblowing in Academia

This paper aims to describe the status of whistleblowing channels in academic institutions as well as the perception that academics have towards the act of reporting unethical issues. Due to European legislation, organizations are obliged to provide reporting mechanisms. Our results show that a large number of individuals within the academic context suffer unethical issues. These results may trigger the possibility that academic institutions have been failing (i) to provide robust mechanisms to identify and investigate unethical behaviors in academia and (ii) to disseminate/discuss the act of reporting within students and staff. Taking into consideration the results and the reality that exists in academic institutions where demanding workload and stress promote environments where retaliations are expected, the authors discuss needs that institutions need to reflect on regarding compliance, integrity and ethics as well as forensic evidence that can be used in investigations in order to provide a safe space to report unethical issues that are observed or experienced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brazilian Journal of Forensic Science Medical Law and Bioethics
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17063/bjfs12(3)y2024274-290
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Whistleblowing in Academia

Rui Manuel Freire Sampaio, Darragh McCashin, Francisco Valente Gonçalves, Susana Sousa Lourenço et al.
Brazilian Journal of Forensic Science Medical Law and Bioethics
Ethics in Business and Education
article

Analysis of Whistleblowing in Academia

Rui Manuel Freire Sampaio, Darragh McCashin, Francisco Valente Gonçalves, Susana Sousa Lourenço, Sofia Correia Alegria
article en

Abstract

This paper aims to describe the status of whistleblowing channels in academic institutions as well as the perception that academics have towards the act of reporting unethical issues. Due to European legislation, organizations are obliged to provide reporting mechanisms. Our results show that a large number of individuals within the academic context suffer unethical issues. These results may trigger the possibility that academic institutions have been failing (i) to provide robust mechanisms to identify and investigate unethical behaviors in academia and (ii) to disseminate/discuss the act of reporting within students and staff. Taking into consideration the results and the reality that exists in academic institutions where demanding workload and stress promote environments where retaliations are expected, the authors discuss needs that institutions need to reflect on regarding compliance, integrity and ethics as well as forensic evidence that can be used in investigations in order to provide a safe space to report unethical issues that are observed or experienced.

Brazilian Journal of Forensic Science Medical Law and BioethicsVol. 12(3)
University of Lisbon (PT), Sport Lisboa e Benfica (PT), Dublin City University (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.