Insights into the chemical evolution of sub-arc magmas from the high-pressure electrical conductivity of basaltic and andesitic magmas

Abstract The continental crust is rich in aluminosilicates and formed by the crystallization of arc magmas. However, the magma produced at sub-arc depths is often silica-poor. The chemical evolution of sub-arc magma from silica-poor to aluminosilicate-rich is perplexing. Magnetotelluric (MT) observations in subduction zones and complementary laboratory-based constraints of electrical conductivity (σ) are crucial to understanding this chemical evolution. The σ of a magma is sensitive to pressure (P), temperature (T), and chemistry (X). To date, laboratory-based measurements on the σ of silicate melts have helped to interpret MT observations at P ≤ 2 GPa. Yet, the melting in subduction zones could occur deeper, at P ≤ 6–7 GPa. The σ of melt at such pressures is poorly constrained. To address this, we performed experiments at P ≤ 6 GPa to examine the σ of basaltic to andesitic melts, which are common in subduction zones. We constrained the effects of silica, alumina, alkali, alkaline, and water (H2O) contents on the σ of melt. The activation volume of σ increases with silica contents. Hence, the σ of basaltic melt is overall greater than that of an andesitic counterpart. The σ of basaltic magma is also less sensitive to P than andesitic magma. Water lowers the activation energy and enhances σ for all melt compositions. Our results help constrain how the electrical properties of a magma change with an evolving composition in a subduction zone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geology
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1130/g52545.1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights into the chemical evolution of sub-arc magmas from the high-pressure electrical conductivity of basaltic and andesitic magmas

Geeth Manthilake, Mainak Mookherjee, Aaron Wolfgang Ashley, Federica Schiavi
4 citations
Geology
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
7.47
article

Insights into the chemical evolution of sub-arc magmas from the high-pressure electrical conductivity of basaltic and andesitic magmas

Geeth Manthilake, Mainak Mookherjee, Aaron Wolfgang Ashley, Federica Schiavi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The continental crust is rich in aluminosilicates and formed by the crystallization of arc magmas. However, the magma produced at sub-arc depths is often silica-poor. The chemical evolution of sub-arc magma from silica-poor to aluminosilicate-rich is perplexing. Magnetotelluric (MT) observations in subduction zones and complementary laboratory-based constraints of electrical conductivity (σ) are crucial to understanding this chemical evolution. The σ of a magma is sensitive to pressure (P), temperature (T), and chemistry (X). To date, laboratory-based measurements on the σ of silicate melts have helped to interpret MT observations at P ≤ 2 GPa. Yet, the melting in subduction zones could occur deeper, at P ≤ 6–7 GPa. The σ of melt at such pressures is poorly constrained. To address this, we performed experiments at P ≤ 6 GPa to examine the σ of basaltic to andesitic melts, which are common in subduction zones. We constrained the effects of silica, alumina, alkali, alkaline, and water (H2O) contents on the σ of melt. The activation volume of σ increases with silica contents. Hence, the σ of basaltic melt is overall greater than that of an andesitic counterpart. The σ of basaltic magma is also less sensitive to P than andesitic magma. Water lowers the activation energy and enhances σ for all melt compositions. Our results help constrain how the electrical properties of a magma change with an evolving composition in a subduction zone.

GeologyVol. 53(6)
Florida State University (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Clermont Auvergne (FR), Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
National Science Foundation, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Florida State University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut national des sciences de l'Univers
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
7.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.