The great scientific acceleration: Scientometrics and time-binding techniques 1950–1980

This article examines discourse on science citations and information between 1950 and 1980. Drawing upon the works of Eugene Garfield, John Desmond Bernal, and Derek de Solla Price, it explores how the scientific publication became a locus for shaping temporalities. Narratives and visual representations were “time-binding techniques,” which captured, arranged, and displayed temporalities. Past, present, and future were not merely sequential but intricately interwoven. It gave rise to ambivalent notions of both progress and potential hazards of unchecked scientific growth. Furthermore, the article underscores how time-binding techniques had both ontological and policy effects. They defined a place of contemporary society within a chronological flow of time. These accounts also generated calls for rational science policies and stewardship of science amidst what was perceived as an ongoing information explosion. By synthesizing research on historical time and history of postwar science policies, the article contributes to an understanding of temporalities emerging from the sciences in the postwar era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Time & Society
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463x241304525
Citations
2
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The great scientific acceleration: Scientometrics and time-binding techniques 1950–1980

Staffan Bergwik
2 citations
Time & Society
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
2.80
article

The great scientific acceleration: Scientometrics and time-binding techniques 1950–1980

Staffan Bergwik
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article examines discourse on science citations and information between 1950 and 1980. Drawing upon the works of Eugene Garfield, John Desmond Bernal, and Derek de Solla Price, it explores how the scientific publication became a locus for shaping temporalities. Narratives and visual representations were “time-binding techniques,” which captured, arranged, and displayed temporalities. Past, present, and future were not merely sequential but intricately interwoven. It gave rise to ambivalent notions of both progress and potential hazards of unchecked scientific growth. Furthermore, the article underscores how time-binding techniques had both ontological and policy effects. They defined a place of contemporary society within a chronological flow of time. These accounts also generated calls for rational science policies and stewardship of science amidst what was perceived as an ongoing information explosion. By synthesizing research on historical time and history of postwar science policies, the article contributes to an understanding of temporalities emerging from the sciences in the postwar era.

Time & Society
Stockholm University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
2.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.