INTERVENÇÕES ASSISTIDAS POR ANIMAIS E BENEFÍCIOS DAS INTERAÇÕES HOMEM – ANIMAL: UMA REVISÃO DE LITERATURA

The objective of this study was to present a review of scientific literature, published from 2014 to 2019, that presents therapeutic and psychotherapeutic evidence of the participation of non-human animals as co-therapists in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI) practices. The methodological approach followed the foundations of systematic review, as an attitude and method of rigor. Thirty-five studies were analyzed. Among the results systematized and analyzed, we highlight: the prevalence of studies with dogs as co-therapists; omissions of information regarding the well-being of the animal co-therapist; predominance of the English language in the publications; psychology professionals who stood out in terms of publications; children as the audience most benefited by the interactions and Animal-Assisted Therapy being the most used intervention. At the end, some risks, limits and suggestions for research in the field of AAIs were presented, which favor all the ramifications of this therapeutic potential.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista fisio&terapia.
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/ni10202503191353
Primary Topic
Animal and Plant Science Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTERVENÇÕES ASSISTIDAS POR ANIMAIS E BENEFÍCIOS DAS INTERAÇÕES HOMEM – ANIMAL: UMA REVISÃO DE LITERATURA

Ana Paula Rezzo Pires Reinert, Jean Marlos Pinheiro Borba
Revista fisio&terapia.
Animal and Plant Science Education
article

INTERVENÇÕES ASSISTIDAS POR ANIMAIS E BENEFÍCIOS DAS INTERAÇÕES HOMEM – ANIMAL: UMA REVISÃO DE LITERATURA

Ana Paula Rezzo Pires Reinert, Jean Marlos Pinheiro Borba
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study was to present a review of scientific literature, published from 2014 to 2019, that presents therapeutic and psychotherapeutic evidence of the participation of non-human animals as co-therapists in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI) practices. The methodological approach followed the foundations of systematic review, as an attitude and method of rigor. Thirty-five studies were analyzed. Among the results systematized and analyzed, we highlight: the prevalence of studies with dogs as co-therapists; omissions of information regarding the well-being of the animal co-therapist; predominance of the English language in the publications; psychology professionals who stood out in terms of publications; children as the audience most benefited by the interactions and Animal-Assisted Therapy being the most used intervention. At the end, some risks, limits and suggestions for research in the field of AAIs were presented, which favor all the ramifications of this therapeutic potential.

Revista fisio&terapia.Vol. 29(144)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Animal and Plant Science Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.