Comparing Apparent Haptic Motion and Funneling for the Perception of Tactile Animation Illusions On a Circular Tactile Display

Tactile animation illusions are used to display dynamic information with haptic cues. In this study, we investigate two forms of tactile animation illusions that leverage the Funneling effect and Apparent Haptic Motion (AHM) on a one-dimensional circular tactile display. We define new parameters for the description of AHM that describe both the temporal and spatial aspects of these animations: Angle per Actuator (APA) and Revolution Duration (RD). We present three user studies about the perception of angular animations produced with these effects. Our results show that people can interpret AHM animations regardless of the APA value and that they can interpret tactile animation illusions slower than one degree per second. We also showed that the participants' ability to discriminate angular animations improves proportionally with the angle presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Haptics
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/toh.2025.3552992
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Apparent Haptic Motion and Funneling for the Perception of Tactile Animation Illusions On a Circular Tactile Display

Rahul Kumar Ray, Thomas Pietrzak
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Haptics
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
2.86
article

Comparing Apparent Haptic Motion and Funneling for the Perception of Tactile Animation Illusions On a Circular Tactile Display

Rahul Kumar Ray, Thomas Pietrzak
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Tactile animation illusions are used to display dynamic information with haptic cues. In this study, we investigate two forms of tactile animation illusions that leverage the Funneling effect and Apparent Haptic Motion (AHM) on a one-dimensional circular tactile display. We define new parameters for the description of AHM that describe both the temporal and spatial aspects of these animations: Angle per Actuator (APA) and Revolution Duration (RD). We present three user studies about the perception of angular animations produced with these effects. Our results show that people can interpret AHM animations regardless of the APA value and that they can interpret tactile animation illusions slower than one degree per second. We also showed that the participants' ability to discriminate angular animations improves proportionally with the angle presented.

IEEE Transactions on HapticsVol. 18(2)
Université de Lille (FR), Flame University (IN)
Bpifrance, Région Hauts-de-France
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing Apparent Haptic Motion and Funneling for the Perception of Tactile Animation Illusions On a Circular Tactile Display — Rahul Kumar Ray, Thomas Pietrzak · IEEE Transactions on Haptics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS