Separate to punish

In 1849, the Grand Duchy of Tuscany established the buona compagnia (good company) system, to confine convicts according to the principles of continuous segregation. Similar to foreign experiments with separate systems, it was presented as a milder version of Philadelphia’s solitary confinement. The adoption of the buona compagnia was a turning point in a broader campaign of prison reform that completely redefined the penal spaces and living conditions of Tuscan prisoners. Through a case study of the reconstruction of fortress of Volterra, this article examines the role that various protagonists played in shaping the trajectory of Tuscan penal reform. Starting in the 1830s, a series of renovations modified the fortress’s interior layout, making it the best place to experiment with new systems of segregation and new punishments. By employing the analytical concept “punitive regimes,” this article analyses the spatial dimensions of the fortress in order to show the relationship between the reform and the punitive spaces.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Crime Histoire et Sociétés
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4000/13im2
Primary Topic
Decadence, Literature, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Separate to punish

Andrea Giuliani
Crime Histoire et Sociétés
Decadence, Literature, and Society
article

Separate to punish

Andrea Giuliani
article en

Abstract

In 1849, the Grand Duchy of Tuscany established the buona compagnia (good company) system, to confine convicts according to the principles of continuous segregation. Similar to foreign experiments with separate systems, it was presented as a milder version of Philadelphia’s solitary confinement. The adoption of the buona compagnia was a turning point in a broader campaign of prison reform that completely redefined the penal spaces and living conditions of Tuscan prisoners. Through a case study of the reconstruction of fortress of Volterra, this article examines the role that various protagonists played in shaping the trajectory of Tuscan penal reform. Starting in the 1830s, a series of renovations modified the fortress’s interior layout, making it the best place to experiment with new systems of segregation and new punishments. By employing the analytical concept “punitive regimes,” this article analyses the spatial dimensions of the fortress in order to show the relationship between the reform and the punitive spaces.

Crime Histoire et SociétésVol. vol. 28, n°2
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Decadence, Literature, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.