Redefining Perceived Boundaries: Insights into the Audit Committee’s Evolving Responsibilities

ABSTRACT Oversight responsibilities for many audit committees (ACs) are evolving to include some of the hottest topics in the boardroom: enterprise risk management, cybersecurity, and environmental, social, and governance reporting. However, certain ACs avoid overseeing these evolving areas, creating significant variation across boards in the assignment of responsibilities. In this study, we seek to understand how ACs respond when environmental changes create new evolving risks that may extend the boundary of their traditional domain. To do so, we interview a diverse set of 29 AC members from U.S. publicly traded companies. We analyze our data through the theoretical lens of collaborative boundary work to identify how ACs respond by extending, blurring, or maintaining their perceived oversight boundaries, the related implications of these decisions, and their key tactics employed to manage AC workload. Our findings should be of interest to boards, investors, and regulators tasked with monitoring AC effectiveness. JEL Classifications: G34; M41; M42.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Accounting Review
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2023-0474
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining Perceived Boundaries: Insights into the Audit Committee’s Evolving Responsibilities

Sarah E. Stein, Lauren M. Cunningham, Kimberly Walker, Karneisha Wolfe
4 citations
The Accounting Review
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
7.82
article

Redefining Perceived Boundaries: Insights into the Audit Committee’s Evolving Responsibilities

Sarah E. Stein, Lauren M. Cunningham, Kimberly Walker, Karneisha Wolfe
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Oversight responsibilities for many audit committees (ACs) are evolving to include some of the hottest topics in the boardroom: enterprise risk management, cybersecurity, and environmental, social, and governance reporting. However, certain ACs avoid overseeing these evolving areas, creating significant variation across boards in the assignment of responsibilities. In this study, we seek to understand how ACs respond when environmental changes create new evolving risks that may extend the boundary of their traditional domain. To do so, we interview a diverse set of 29 AC members from U.S. publicly traded companies. We analyze our data through the theoretical lens of collaborative boundary work to identify how ACs respond by extending, blurring, or maintaining their perceived oversight boundaries, the related implications of these decisions, and their key tactics employed to manage AC workload. Our findings should be of interest to boards, investors, and regulators tasked with monitoring AC effectiveness. JEL Classifications: G34; M41; M42.

The Accounting ReviewVol. 100(4)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.